FNMA Opinions 08/28/2014 07:23:59 $FNMA
http://www.valuewalk.com/2014/08/regal-point-...nq-mobile/
We should be well over $6.25 a share by now. Anticipating a HUGE SPIKE coming
FNMA Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Fannie-Mae-FNMA-61730/
This issue is far more complicated than many realize, we need to publicize the fact that "Fannie and Freddie were victims and not the villains". It was within this same post a short while later we received the Job posting tip. For those who have been following closely, it is obvious that the wheels are in motion. I wish I could somehow transmit all of my knowledge regarding our cause; things would probably make more sense.
http://timhoward717.com/
It seems like we are the guy trying to get laid by the girl that plays hard to get, making herself more
desirable. We always seem to want things we can’t get.
Fannie Mae unable to dispel NYSE listing news. -- timhoward717
Fannie Mae-Straight Talk
http://timhoward717.com
Wa'a Alaikum Assalamu kabanch $$FNMA$$
I also said I was long and positive FNMA...
I just think this job advertisement is more smoke than the actual fire....
IMO: The real news will come from the bench of a courtroom...or some meeting room where a settlement is made.
You mean this response where the FNMA spokesperson said that it was basically a standard part of the job description that is part of the corporate by laws...so they have to say they need an attorney with NYSE listing experience.
"A spokesman for Fannie said the mortgage lender has “no plans” to list on the NYSE, and that the job listing for someone with knowledge of the NYSE listing requirements is based on Fannie’s corporate governance guidelines. “As noted in our Corporate Governance Guidelines…the director independence requirement is set forth in FHFA corporate governance regulation 12 C.F.R. 1710.10, which requires the standard of independence adopted by the NYSE,” the spokesman added."
please remember my disclosure said I am long FNMA and positive about the outcome of FNMA.
This could still be an advertisement with a 6 year old job description because the guy/gal they hired 6 years ago has left.
Also FHFA was created in 2008 per the FHFA website.
Enacted in response to the financial crisis of 2007-08, the Act created the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as supervisor of the enterprises and the Banks (together, the regulated entities); abolished OFHEO and the FHFB; and transferred mission supervision of the enterprises from HUD to FHFA, thereby consolidating all supervision of the enterprises within FHFA.
Basically the FHFA was a consolidation of OFHEO and FHFB..so the position decription for the advertisement was probably updated in 2008. Fannie Mae has been around for years. They probably did a quick update in 2008 when the FHFA was created.
Fannie and Freddie weren't delisted until the summer of 2010.
WONG!!!!
$$$$$FNMA$$$$$
This is not the worry now. Wind down speech is over.
Haha...won't know if we have great minds until we head higher. If we get faked out...that will suuuuuck
This is no '20 year old' job description. The FHFA has only been around for 6 years.
Quote:
KEY JOB FUNCTIONS
Provide advice and counsel on corporate governance and securities law matters, including Federal Housing Finance Agency, ‘34 Act, and NYSE listing requirements, among others.
Haha! Great minds think alike, eh?
Quote:
"You've got balls………….I like……balls"
Haha, not me, I don't like balls of course, lol. Tooottallly hetero here. Thought it was appropriate though. Market orders fall into that "faith" category. Good luck bud.
Lol....Duhhh...the majority of home buyers from a 2004 - a few years ago were in a different category....They were all totally credit based...Meaning...Drive by appraisals..., Lower rates for better credit scores which could be fudged......I never saw so many housewives that made 6 to 7,000 a month for being the "owner of a cleaning company"..fake documents were submitted to loans and prevalent at that time....The mortgage amount for the average person nearly tripled in their borrowing power!!!
Lol that is my strategy as well believe it or not. I plan to buy half of my shares now but I won't be buying the other half until we close over the 50 dma. I will play with the half and hey if this was really a headfake and we really drop to 3.76 or 3.70 (200 dma)...what can I say...I did my best with my limited ability. By playing with half now...I minimize my loss should this be a headfake. If this moves higher and I average up with my other half around 4.03/4.04...oh well at least my total average is lower
Understand. Seems you may have missed Fannie Mae response to this posting this afternoon. I recommend you either use your scroll down on your mouse and read the other posts, or do a Google search of their response. Its not an old listing.
Okay got it thanks.
“The indictment alleges that Charikov recruited his loan officer wife, Romanishin, 32, of West Sacramento; Tuzman, 42, of Citrus Heights; and Talybov, 32, of Antelope, as straw buyers in transactions involving the sale and purchase of two West Sacramento properties in 2006 and 2007.
“After the first set of straw buyers obtained the proceeds from Talybov’s fraudulent purchases, they allegedly split the take with Charikov. Subsequently, Talybov defaulted on loans for both properties.
All four were charged with fraud that resulted in alleged losses to the lenders of at least $710,000. Charikov and Tuzman were also charged with laundering their ill-gotten gains.”
Got it so far? The United States Attorney, in a hard-hit part of California, used its massive massive, taxpayer-funded resources, and made the decision to charge the low-level fraudsters, and none of the bankers. No plea deals were reached.
Instead, in an act of incredible lawyering, the defense attorneys turned the case on its head by arguing the real criminals were the banksters! Unbelievable.
Remember, to prove fraud, one element is reliance. That means the banksters, who lost the $710,000, had to prove that they relied upon the statements in the loan application to lend the money. The criminal defendants showed that the loans would have been made anyway, whether the application information was true or completely false. Thus, there was no reliance, an essential element, and the jury acquitted the criminal defendants. Brilliant, simply brilliant, and my hat is off to those fine lawyers who advocated a winning position. It was a risky move, too, one that drew sharp objections from the prosecution:
http://www.valuewalk.com/2014/08/regal-point-...nq-mobile/
We should be well over $6.25 a share by now. Anticipating a HUGE SPIKE coming
FNMA Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Fannie-Mae-FNMA-61730/
This issue is far more complicated than many realize, we need to publicize the fact that "Fannie and Freddie were victims and not the villains". It was within this same post a short while later we received the Job posting tip. For those who have been following closely, it is obvious that the wheels are in motion. I wish I could somehow transmit all of my knowledge regarding our cause; things would probably make more sense.
http://timhoward717.com/
It seems like we are the guy trying to get laid by the girl that plays hard to get, making herself more
desirable. We always seem to want things we can’t get.
Fannie Mae unable to dispel NYSE listing news. -- timhoward717
Fannie Mae-Straight Talk
http://timhoward717.com
Wa'a Alaikum Assalamu kabanch $$FNMA$$
I also said I was long and positive FNMA...
I just think this job advertisement is more smoke than the actual fire....
IMO: The real news will come from the bench of a courtroom...or some meeting room where a settlement is made.
You mean this response where the FNMA spokesperson said that it was basically a standard part of the job description that is part of the corporate by laws...so they have to say they need an attorney with NYSE listing experience.
"A spokesman for Fannie said the mortgage lender has “no plans” to list on the NYSE, and that the job listing for someone with knowledge of the NYSE listing requirements is based on Fannie’s corporate governance guidelines. “As noted in our Corporate Governance Guidelines…the director independence requirement is set forth in FHFA corporate governance regulation 12 C.F.R. 1710.10, which requires the standard of independence adopted by the NYSE,” the spokesman added."
please remember my disclosure said I am long FNMA and positive about the outcome of FNMA.
This could still be an advertisement with a 6 year old job description because the guy/gal they hired 6 years ago has left.
Also FHFA was created in 2008 per the FHFA website.
Enacted in response to the financial crisis of 2007-08, the Act created the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) as supervisor of the enterprises and the Banks (together, the regulated entities); abolished OFHEO and the FHFB; and transferred mission supervision of the enterprises from HUD to FHFA, thereby consolidating all supervision of the enterprises within FHFA.
Basically the FHFA was a consolidation of OFHEO and FHFB..so the position decription for the advertisement was probably updated in 2008. Fannie Mae has been around for years. They probably did a quick update in 2008 when the FHFA was created.
Fannie and Freddie weren't delisted until the summer of 2010.
WONG!!!!
$$$$$FNMA$$$$$
This is not the worry now. Wind down speech is over.
Haha...won't know if we have great minds until we head higher. If we get faked out...that will suuuuuck
This is no '20 year old' job description. The FHFA has only been around for 6 years.
Quote:
KEY JOB FUNCTIONS
Provide advice and counsel on corporate governance and securities law matters, including Federal Housing Finance Agency, ‘34 Act, and NYSE listing requirements, among others.
Haha! Great minds think alike, eh?
Quote:
"You've got balls………….I like……balls"
Haha, not me, I don't like balls of course, lol. Tooottallly hetero here. Thought it was appropriate though. Market orders fall into that "faith" category. Good luck bud.
Lol....Duhhh...the majority of home buyers from a 2004 - a few years ago were in a different category....They were all totally credit based...Meaning...Drive by appraisals..., Lower rates for better credit scores which could be fudged......I never saw so many housewives that made 6 to 7,000 a month for being the "owner of a cleaning company"..fake documents were submitted to loans and prevalent at that time....The mortgage amount for the average person nearly tripled in their borrowing power!!!
Lol that is my strategy as well believe it or not. I plan to buy half of my shares now but I won't be buying the other half until we close over the 50 dma. I will play with the half and hey if this was really a headfake and we really drop to 3.76 or 3.70 (200 dma)...what can I say...I did my best with my limited ability. By playing with half now...I minimize my loss should this be a headfake. If this moves higher and I average up with my other half around 4.03/4.04...oh well at least my total average is lower
Understand. Seems you may have missed Fannie Mae response to this posting this afternoon. I recommend you either use your scroll down on your mouse and read the other posts, or do a Google search of their response. Its not an old listing.
Okay got it thanks.
“The indictment alleges that Charikov recruited his loan officer wife, Romanishin, 32, of West Sacramento; Tuzman, 42, of Citrus Heights; and Talybov, 32, of Antelope, as straw buyers in transactions involving the sale and purchase of two West Sacramento properties in 2006 and 2007.
“After the first set of straw buyers obtained the proceeds from Talybov’s fraudulent purchases, they allegedly split the take with Charikov. Subsequently, Talybov defaulted on loans for both properties.
All four were charged with fraud that resulted in alleged losses to the lenders of at least $710,000. Charikov and Tuzman were also charged with laundering their ill-gotten gains.”
Got it so far? The United States Attorney, in a hard-hit part of California, used its massive massive, taxpayer-funded resources, and made the decision to charge the low-level fraudsters, and none of the bankers. No plea deals were reached.
Instead, in an act of incredible lawyering, the defense attorneys turned the case on its head by arguing the real criminals were the banksters! Unbelievable.
Remember, to prove fraud, one element is reliance. That means the banksters, who lost the $710,000, had to prove that they relied upon the statements in the loan application to lend the money. The criminal defendants showed that the loans would have been made anyway, whether the application information was true or completely false. Thus, there was no reliance, an essential element, and the jury acquitted the criminal defendants. Brilliant, simply brilliant, and my hat is off to those fine lawyers who advocated a winning position. It was a risky move, too, one that drew sharp objections from the prosecution:
