Thats ok, I don't understand your statement or question!
9:1 buy/sell ratio today.
HH
FNMA Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Fannie-Mae-FNMA-61730/
Great video thanks for sharing.
Escobar season has returned
4fun
If Ackman says 20-23 at low end diluted - I buy that
Danno
80% is a lot
now I might hedge and say it will all be "negotiated"
let the GOV make enough money to look good but get rid of the sr pfds and capitalize F and F
IMO that REQUIRES some further capital infusion into F and F
looking at Fannie alone
Maybe set a price of say 18-20 bucks a share for an IPO of 2 billion shares. 66% new owners - old owners 33% - gov declares money paid so far as payment in full with 10% !! and F gets the capital it needs to compete
(this is based off a guess that a market leading Fannie is worth about 40-80 Billion in market cap)
now if the GOV starts to limit the space and size of F and force them alone to do certain things - well then the GOV should put up more of the capital and dilute less
I will take 18 bucks a share and for this nonsense to be over (and per my economics have a non loan producing entity as the largest bundler/insurer of paper)
Found somebody's response to your question:
1. make it more costly for private capital to back more than the 1% of the current market they contribute to.
2. make killing FNMA and FMCC EVEN HARDER...
Fox segment:
http://video.foxbusiness.com/v/3751903487001/...show-clips
todays significant news was the AIG lawsuit results ...
not the 2 week old Corporate lawyer job posting including NYSE uplisting skills
mikol
saying first that BO support for the senate bill confuses me - totally
what about the statement is wrong or untrue? (other then the white house wanted more loan forgiveness)
Ever wonder exactly how many seller/servicers
Fannie Mae serves ? According to new servicing
commentary on its website,
the GSE counts roughly 1,100 lenders as its customers…
Got a note on my ameritrade that they have no places to uplist to nyse.
955
look back at your first 30,000 words
your agenda was
Gov Policies aimed to help the poor caused ....
fact
And Gov is not innocent
Gov is often bought and paid for
Gov is often stupid or ignorant or both
But no I do not think there was a plot by GOV to work with banks to transfer wealth
GOV transfers wealth by tax or program
Bush transferred gillions to the exremely rich/wealthy with his tax cut
Obama is transferring gillions to the lower working class (above medicaid) with the ACA subsidies (which of course is the real reason people like FORBES and CRYSTAL are so against it - nothing to do with mandates or standardization - it is a massive reverse wealth transfer !! - just like Social and Medicare
Some of us believe such wealth transfers by a democracy based elected gov of the people is how Capitalism survives and thrives
F and F should have a limited role in this - and any help to the lower part of the working class should be more visible and above board
Please elaborate upon in which Millena this will happen,
as I would like to leave a note for my ancestors to let them know that someday they will be rich.........TIA
It's all good!
More measures for FnF not to get screwed again.
That's Ackman's diluted target... with full government warrants accounting for ~80% ownership.
Multiply by 5 for full release target of $100 to $250
Heck - Zargis - run for anything - you got my vote.
Anyone have any ideas on how this will effect us?
http://therealdeal.com/blog/2014/08/27/sec-cr...ies-rules/
If I was up for election... I would want all the bad news to hit after the votes are tallied and I have another term in office.
Be well,
-Zargis
That was not my target, I responded to one