despite the impressive "look and feel" of your post, you did not address any of the fundamental points I made. You just nit-picked selected words and slipped into the "why are you here if you are not invested" viewpoint. This is getting tiresome.
Can you address the critical truth, and this is very critical, that everything that JB has stated as fact has turned out to be false? EVERYTHING. The lies are there for all to see.
why is it that whenever this is brought up, the response is always deflected away from Bordynuik and towards the one pointing out the truth about Bordynuik?
What do my limitations, my faults, my gray areas have to do with the fact that nothing Bordynuik has stated as fact has turned out true? If Bordynuik's absolute history of telling falsehoods AND NEVER TELLING THE TRUTH is not a red flag, what is?
Can you or any other long find anything that JB has stated that turned out to be the case? If not, then why would you trust your money with him?
And, as far as the "tech" is concerned, what is the source of all these glowing tributes from the longs? What is the source? Certainly NOT any third-party verifications! At this stage of the game, is there any rational person familiar with the history of JBI that would accept what John Bordynuik tells them? Blindly believing a lie from a very consistent liar is proper DD?
We hear all the time about the longs' absolute confidence in their own DD, yet I have yet to see anything remotely resembling Due Diligence.
There were many people who believed Obama about no changes "period" to their health plans. I warned people about this, and from many I got the same viewpoint as presented here: nothing but criticism of the motives of those critical of the plan (i.e., you're a racist), but nothing logical regarding the health plan itself.
Only negative consequences come from believing falsehoods. Go ahead and be my guest!
Can you address the critical truth, and this is very critical, that everything that JB has stated as fact has turned out to be false? EVERYTHING. The lies are there for all to see.
why is it that whenever this is brought up, the response is always deflected away from Bordynuik and towards the one pointing out the truth about Bordynuik?
What do my limitations, my faults, my gray areas have to do with the fact that nothing Bordynuik has stated as fact has turned out true? If Bordynuik's absolute history of telling falsehoods AND NEVER TELLING THE TRUTH is not a red flag, what is?
Can you or any other long find anything that JB has stated that turned out to be the case? If not, then why would you trust your money with him?
And, as far as the "tech" is concerned, what is the source of all these glowing tributes from the longs? What is the source? Certainly NOT any third-party verifications! At this stage of the game, is there any rational person familiar with the history of JBI that would accept what John Bordynuik tells them? Blindly believing a lie from a very consistent liar is proper DD?
We hear all the time about the longs' absolute confidence in their own DD, yet I have yet to see anything remotely resembling Due Diligence.
There were many people who believed Obama about no changes "period" to their health plans. I warned people about this, and from many I got the same viewpoint as presented here: nothing but criticism of the motives of those critical of the plan (i.e., you're a racist), but nothing logical regarding the health plan itself.
Only negative consequences come from believing falsehoods. Go ahead and be my guest!
