We still have other multiple Confirmable&Viable Bayer Links!Glta,eom.
I noticed that if you right click on that page
http://www.bayerpharma.com/en/research-and-de...mp;print=1
and go to view page source and it says <!-- whg_field_dateGenerated=2013-03-25T09:41:06Z+3600SECONDS -->
Doesn't that mean it's was created 3/25/2013
PPHM Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/Peregrine-Pharmac...PHM-55152/
you have reached 192.168.1.1, Biopharm can't come to the phone right now so please leave a message and can get right back to you.
( Biopharm was all set to have sweet dreams tonight... should have shut the computer off immediately after my last post : )
Biopharm, Based on IFU's Research, that may be...
old info from 2004
see link
And am in process of having my post deleted to avoid confusion.
But, I did not check line by line and compare my posted link to IFU's info... there is always a slight chance it is both old and new??? But, I can't be sure. But at first glance it does appear to match the 2004 SEC filing.
As for googling, I entered the following into the search field and the Bayer link showed up fourth on list with no date, nor is date found when page is loaded:
bayer peregrine partner
GLTA Real Stockholders!
nice find 4OurRetirement! Now I must call Google first thing in the morning and demand why that link did not show up for me on my many, prior google searches lol Of course I think I know why... but I thought I beat the system......but anyhow:
I noticed your link says this directly:
Quote:
Partnering
Broad Networking for long-term success
To be able to develop innovative products, a company needs an appropriate environment – in Germany, in Europe and worldwide – and strong partners.
With a global network of external scientific and industrial development partners, we strengthen our own research infrastructure and, therefore, assure the long-term success of our product pipeline.
To supplement our internal efforts, we collaborate with several companies in different stages of the typical pharmaceutical research cycle. Our more significant collaborations are described (in alphabetical order) in the table below.
(.... and in the full list of Bayer partners is listed Peregrine Pharmaceuticals in the following manner)
Peregrine Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Selective cancer diagnostics (vascular targeting agents)
http://www.bayerpharma.com/en/research-and-de...nering.php
Now I didn't want to sound too foolish talking about linkedin PAV lists, but I guess its a good time to mention that "Bayer" and Peegrinen are linked in other "non-tangible" ways so to speak.... but what does one do when they possibly see good fortunes in a companies future? They "follow" that company on linkedin... and I'll only list a couple as I don't like to just name names but hey... its the internet! The best way to isolate some names down are track the ones that follow "very few" biotech companies and include Peregrine, then one may backtrack to find why they possibly "follow" Peregrine. What happens when the pattern grows and includes more than a few "Bayer" employee names... ?? Hmmmmm
here is just a couple that just started following Peregrine in the past 30 days!:
1) http://www.linkedin.com/pub/kimberly-white/64/b50/324
2) Also another one here that I find interesting, mainly because he does not follow many biotech companies so to speak in particular like the normal ones that I see....and #1 on his PAV list is a "Bayer" crop scientist at Bayer = "Donglan Tian"
https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=2216...hb_upphoto
IFU, GoodFind, I Agree- OldInfo, I will delete your posts per your request and request this and my prior 2 posts be deleted also:
Attn Mods or Admin:
Please delete this post and my post # 187516 & 187520
Thanks and sorry for the confusion.
Could not find date regarding info posted.
Once again thanks to IFU for a quick data search!
I updated my post with the SEC filing with that information. IMO, the posts should be deleted because it is somewhat misleading.
I Could not Find date...Where did you find?tia,glta.
That is information from 2004; therefore, I highly doubt it is anything meaningful.
http://sec.edgar-online.com/bayer-schering-ph...tion6.aspx
We have applied various imaging stratagems to assess changes in tumor vasculature in response to VDAs: notably MRI (1H and 19F), near infrared spectroscopy, dynamic bioluminescence, dynamic fluorescence, and ultrasound. These studies are currently under active development in collaboration with Kevin Pinney, Ph.D. and Mary Lynn Trawick, Ph.D. of Baylor University.
We are also pursuing other vascular targeting agents, which exploit unique characteristics of tumors; these agents may be used to detect tumors or as potential therapeutics but generally do not cause acute vascular disruption. These studies are being pursued in collaboration with UT Southwestern Medical Center's Sally Ward-Ober, Ph.D., Alan Schroit, Ph.D., and Rolf Brekken, Ph.D., Raimund Ober, Ph.D. of UT Dallas; and were initiated with the late Phil Thorpe, Ph.D.
That is an interesting one.
CP(&Board, Stumbled Upon Interesting Bayer info while googling...
source link click here
bayerpharma.com/en/research-and-development/partnering.php:
Partnering...
Please follow the link, I was not sure about posting copyrighted material, but the link and info were freely found via internet...
Good Luck to All Real Stockholders, Employees, Patients, And Their Families!
Ok CP you get "mds" post of the day!!
Alot of posts but you earned "mds" post of the day!!!
8:00 am silly!! 12 more hours.
Past 8:00 in Tampa and another day with no PR!
Biopharm, Your Dots May Soon CONNECT! GltaRealStockholders!
Quote:
Those "eyes" are fully aware that opportunity to load up at present low s/p will NOT be available for much longer.
Many have been waiting for the coming weeks for years and it seems like that time is here.
More interesting, is that the "PARTNERSHIPS" tab is Bayer... meant bare! ...and has been fully removed from the Peregrine website and Avid Bioservices website. There have been many website changes over the past year and now, the most recent one being the partnerships tab being removed would seem like the most logical last change before a partnership that could move Peregrine much closer to a BP in its own realm.
Hopefully it all means a new partner Soon
I like to observe that it takes confidence and not a little bit of courage to come out for a specific event like Kyoto and make a prediction or two. I don't see that coming from many others, including myself. And how easy it is to dismiss such courage as flippant and shallow. Thank you Cloaked for standing up, in black and white, for what you believe in.