MTVX Recent activities 08/22/2014 13:23:56 $MTVX
Post# of 64200
Posted On: 08/22/2014 2:23:58 PM
MTVX Recent activities 08/22/2014 13:23:56 $MTVX
Freight train picking up steam again, let the ask slapping begin
Lol I know right.. too funny
MTVX Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/APT-Moto-Vox-Grou...TVX-87784/
Thank you for posting, I was confused with DD post. Good things come MTVX!
dianne, your post is a contradiction. there can't be a dismissal (after settlement) hearing scheduled prior to a settlement order granted already. "after" settlement. also I told you which order on the 8/19 filings is the signed order. Its the last one filed by the COURT.
I'm buying.
Why would you wait for a 'signed order' but not accept an Order that ordered the modification of the initial order? You do realize an Order is an order because it is signed, right?
I agree with THIS much...
Quote:
the 8/26 date is to dismiss the case--dismiss meaning "close" the case. Just protocol.
I ALREADY SAID THAT DAYS AGO...
As for the rest??? I'll wait and see the signed order...
Thanks!
Awesome! Thank you Ms BB.
Guess that explains why no pr about it yet?
Thank you Ms. BB... Its pretty elementary...
Thanks Ms. BB, glad I understood what I was reading.
This is 100% correct.
"08/26/2014 at 08:31 am in department 68 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
OSC RE Dismissal (-AFTER SETTLEMENT)", this implies settlement is already executed and the court will hold a hearing on 8/26 to dismiss the entire ligation on 8/26, in layman's terms, close the case.
"08/19/2014 at 08:30 am in Department 68, Mark V. Mooney, Presiding
Exparte proceeding - Denied ", likely during the hearing at 8:30AM, the Judge ordered certain filings before granting the action, hence you see all the filings right after the hearing on the 19th by the attorneys to satisfy the Judges orders, the one to look at is "08/19/2014 Ex-Parte Application (JOINT EXP APP FOR ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO MODIFYORDER FOR APPROVAL OF STIPULATION FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS ) " this filing should have addressed the Judges requirements, otherwise we wouldn't see a new hearing for 8/26 to dismiss the entire case and close the case in all "Dismissal (After settlement)"
"08/19/2014 Ord-Appt Apprv Rptr as Rptr protem (Stella Tapia csr 10124 )
Filed by Court " this should be the approval granted, and filed by COURT.
On your previous post, did you not see an ORDER modifying the order on 8/19? Who do you think signs off on Orders? MTVX or the judge? Geesh.
The settlement is done and modification "ordered" hence the 8/26 date is to dismiss the case--dismiss meaning "close" the case. Just protocol.
Those who heard or opined about settlement being "done" are correct. You have proved them right.
Screenshot from LACourt...Just in case you need to see it yourself...
Bring on the 8K...I want to hear why it says denied, when the "Elite" shareholders were told the Judge signed off on it.
Notice on 4/21...which was the original IronRidge settlement hearing it says "Granted"...
I'll wait right here for the explanation...
Investor sentiment does not change overnight. We need a few weeks of no dilution and a meaty court approval to breakout here IMO. And it will come IMO. Patience grasshopper.
People are trying to shake others up. Not happening! ! Adding to the noise down here. MTVX!!
sam's club, Latin American ect. Gas gas
Their updates are not real-time. No worries. Update coming soon.
$MTVX
Wrong.....so wrong....
Freight train picking up steam again, let the ask slapping begin
Lol I know right.. too funny
MTVX Stock Message Board http://investorshangout.com/APT-Moto-Vox-Grou...TVX-87784/
Thank you for posting, I was confused with DD post. Good things come MTVX!
dianne, your post is a contradiction. there can't be a dismissal (after settlement) hearing scheduled prior to a settlement order granted already. "after" settlement. also I told you which order on the 8/19 filings is the signed order. Its the last one filed by the COURT.
I'm buying.
Why would you wait for a 'signed order' but not accept an Order that ordered the modification of the initial order? You do realize an Order is an order because it is signed, right?
I agree with THIS much...
Quote:
the 8/26 date is to dismiss the case--dismiss meaning "close" the case. Just protocol.
I ALREADY SAID THAT DAYS AGO...
As for the rest??? I'll wait and see the signed order...
Thanks!
Awesome! Thank you Ms BB.
Guess that explains why no pr about it yet?
Thank you Ms. BB... Its pretty elementary...
Thanks Ms. BB, glad I understood what I was reading.
This is 100% correct.
"08/26/2014 at 08:31 am in department 68 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
OSC RE Dismissal (-AFTER SETTLEMENT)", this implies settlement is already executed and the court will hold a hearing on 8/26 to dismiss the entire ligation on 8/26, in layman's terms, close the case.
"08/19/2014 at 08:30 am in Department 68, Mark V. Mooney, Presiding
Exparte proceeding - Denied ", likely during the hearing at 8:30AM, the Judge ordered certain filings before granting the action, hence you see all the filings right after the hearing on the 19th by the attorneys to satisfy the Judges orders, the one to look at is "08/19/2014 Ex-Parte Application (JOINT EXP APP FOR ORDER APPROVING STIPULATION TO MODIFYORDER FOR APPROVAL OF STIPULATION FOR SETTLEMENT OF CLAIMS ) " this filing should have addressed the Judges requirements, otherwise we wouldn't see a new hearing for 8/26 to dismiss the entire case and close the case in all "Dismissal (After settlement)"
"08/19/2014 Ord-Appt Apprv Rptr as Rptr protem (Stella Tapia csr 10124 )
Filed by Court " this should be the approval granted, and filed by COURT.
On your previous post, did you not see an ORDER modifying the order on 8/19? Who do you think signs off on Orders? MTVX or the judge? Geesh.
The settlement is done and modification "ordered" hence the 8/26 date is to dismiss the case--dismiss meaning "close" the case. Just protocol.
Those who heard or opined about settlement being "done" are correct. You have proved them right.
Screenshot from LACourt...Just in case you need to see it yourself...
Bring on the 8K...I want to hear why it says denied, when the "Elite" shareholders were told the Judge signed off on it.
Notice on 4/21...which was the original IronRidge settlement hearing it says "Granted"...
I'll wait right here for the explanation...
Investor sentiment does not change overnight. We need a few weeks of no dilution and a meaty court approval to breakout here IMO. And it will come IMO. Patience grasshopper.
People are trying to shake others up. Not happening! ! Adding to the noise down here. MTVX!!
sam's club, Latin American ect. Gas gas Their updates are not real-time. No worries. Update coming soon.
$MTVX
Wrong.....so wrong....
(0)
(0)