i suspect (if it follows the MO of priors via the
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 08/21/2014 2:02:38 PM
i suspect (if it follows the MO of priors via the vehicle of choice re: OTC stock
manipulation)
it goes more like this
PRO side of the crew set up the very subtle front loading of PTOI (mid 2009)
b4 CON side would enter (Sept 2009) for the usual *soap opera* that has
to always be in place >> *THERE*
notice the first *orchestration* is done in mere days in Dec 2009
tellingly >> SE enters on 6.19.2009
to make the CON side *effective* after first orchestrated *RUN*
SE would have been *courted* >> i literally watched this exact
same scenario play out >> on another totally legit OTC co. in 2009 ..
courting would have initially have been for *shares* to exploit
this too is SOP re: OTC (the given here are *legit* co.s)
you can read the *interaction* and overlap >> there re: who and how *courted*
of course never forget *ancillary* events also in play and not just specific to P2O
*there* sold to ADVFN (London calling) Sept 2006
MB's courier *stopped* in Feb 2007
Nite's *PPS* cut in half Fall of 2009
Penson self *implodes* to take advantage of the proverbial rug 2011/2012
Nite's *glitch* >> also self inflicted for another proverbial rug >> Aug 2012
if i'm reading the tea leaves correctly .. i'd say Etrade has some *issues*
and not just in relation to PTOI
just a reminder >> *entity* is not used to any OTC co. (legit or otherwise)
surviving their attention
without the always requisite R/S >> that of course is immediately abusively shorted
right back to the PPS where *R/S* was undertaken (if not lower)
it's why this *colluding entity* can almost always *outlast* both *retail* and legit mgmts
so SE becomes a tool to be utilized (exploited) by CON side working *there*
odds are >> promised a financial incentive with a *victory* >> for this filth
victory = is a cellar boxed stock with a bloated SS of *over* 1BILLION shares
it also explains the *detail* undertaken by the dolts on 9.28.10
something i've challenged any >> er >> *naysayer* to source
via the dolts >> on any other start up in transition
not surprisingly my challenge went unanswered *there* and avoided *here*
the money in play re: PTOI (5 years' manipulation) is staggering
this is why i want to see how *stock* is handled going forward
4kids
manipulation)
it goes more like this
PRO side of the crew set up the very subtle front loading of PTOI (mid 2009)
b4 CON side would enter (Sept 2009) for the usual *soap opera* that has
to always be in place >> *THERE*
notice the first *orchestration* is done in mere days in Dec 2009
tellingly >> SE enters on 6.19.2009
to make the CON side *effective* after first orchestrated *RUN*
SE would have been *courted* >> i literally watched this exact
same scenario play out >> on another totally legit OTC co. in 2009 ..
courting would have initially have been for *shares* to exploit
this too is SOP re: OTC (the given here are *legit* co.s)
you can read the *interaction* and overlap >> there re: who and how *courted*
of course never forget *ancillary* events also in play and not just specific to P2O
*there* sold to ADVFN (London calling) Sept 2006
MB's courier *stopped* in Feb 2007
Nite's *PPS* cut in half Fall of 2009
Penson self *implodes* to take advantage of the proverbial rug 2011/2012
Nite's *glitch* >> also self inflicted for another proverbial rug >> Aug 2012
if i'm reading the tea leaves correctly .. i'd say Etrade has some *issues*
and not just in relation to PTOI
just a reminder >> *entity* is not used to any OTC co. (legit or otherwise)
surviving their attention
without the always requisite R/S >> that of course is immediately abusively shorted
right back to the PPS where *R/S* was undertaken (if not lower)
it's why this *colluding entity* can almost always *outlast* both *retail* and legit mgmts
so SE becomes a tool to be utilized (exploited) by CON side working *there*
odds are >> promised a financial incentive with a *victory* >> for this filth
victory = is a cellar boxed stock with a bloated SS of *over* 1BILLION shares
it also explains the *detail* undertaken by the dolts on 9.28.10
something i've challenged any >> er >> *naysayer* to source
via the dolts >> on any other start up in transition
not surprisingly my challenge went unanswered *there* and avoided *here*
the money in play re: PTOI (5 years' manipulation) is staggering
this is why i want to see how *stock* is handled going forward
4kids
(0)
(0)