the irony is some of us (P2O investors) actually w

the irony is some of us (P2O investors) actually wanted this outcome

as many know i had an analyst friend look at P2O's
business model .. and that was their advice to me

this is the joy of this firm's decades of experience

regardless i find it rather telling that 1000s of times
this venue was told that mgmt wouldn't execute

interesting to note since March of this year .. what gets
dissed and what doesn't

CFO hired (one third of 150k salary in stock .. 50,000 = 500,000 shares)
dolt (sec) compliant at an expense of $285,000 for 2013's K alone
NYSDEC 5 and 10 year permits >> clearly recognizing P2O *viablity*
Finra's change out of name/ticker/cusip

and now via the public domain for all who've done their DD

we have this national co. with *decades* of leverage >> that can't be impugned

crooks took PTOI *too low* >> they are desperate to PROtect
very specific price points

may they rot in hell for their abusive actions

(60 to 66M shares in PTOI's float last 18 months) and over 57M
re: *volume* Feb 2014 to July 2014

even the crooks understood what the hiring of the CFO in March 2014 meant

and it's why their *volume* backed off so that April and July
had 2 of the lowest *trades* since 2010 (4 years)

crooks rigged the game from the get go[/color] .. mgmt's execution re: P2O
makes them pay upre: PTOI

4kids