OFFICIAL COURT MINUTES OUT------BIG WIN FOR TMMI!!
Post# of 1084
Posted On: 08/20/2014 9:31:03 AM
OFFICIAL COURT MINUTES OUT
BIG WIN FOR TMMI!!!! AGAIN.
AND,.....HP is NOT mentioned, only the old defunct Interwoven (ISI) company that was purchased by Autonomy---nice try at spinning HP into the mix which is completely bogus, and HP had nothing whatsoever to do with TMMI or ISI agreements back then!!
08/14/2014 8:30 AM
- Mr. Stover advised an answer has not been filed and the opposition from the Defendants opposition states the other party has not been included, noting they are a necessary party. Further, Mr. Stover advised the Defendant should answer the counter claims and they should be dispositive of the motion. Court noted they should be a party as a practical matter. Mr. Stover argued that they do not need to be a party and advised he will submit a motion to add them if they answer. Further, Mr. Stover advised they have the right to bring trade secrets into the case as they are exclusive licensees. Mr. Stover advised the Defendants have the burden to show they cannot afford relief and they are fine moving forward without ISI, noting ISI has not claimed any issues related to the case. Mr. Zhong argued that ISI is a necessary party and they must be joined in the case. Further, Mr. Zhong advised the 1996 agreement is between ISI and the plaintiff. Further arguments by counsel. COURT ORDERED, Motion GRANTED, noting ISI must be added as an additional party. Mr. Zhong to prepare the order.
BIG WIN FOR TMMI!!!! AGAIN.
AND,.....HP is NOT mentioned, only the old defunct Interwoven (ISI) company that was purchased by Autonomy---nice try at spinning HP into the mix which is completely bogus, and HP had nothing whatsoever to do with TMMI or ISI agreements back then!!
08/14/2014 8:30 AM
- Mr. Stover advised an answer has not been filed and the opposition from the Defendants opposition states the other party has not been included, noting they are a necessary party. Further, Mr. Stover advised the Defendant should answer the counter claims and they should be dispositive of the motion. Court noted they should be a party as a practical matter. Mr. Stover argued that they do not need to be a party and advised he will submit a motion to add them if they answer. Further, Mr. Stover advised they have the right to bring trade secrets into the case as they are exclusive licensees. Mr. Stover advised the Defendants have the burden to show they cannot afford relief and they are fine moving forward without ISI, noting ISI has not claimed any issues related to the case. Mr. Zhong argued that ISI is a necessary party and they must be joined in the case. Further, Mr. Zhong advised the 1996 agreement is between ISI and the plaintiff. Further arguments by counsel. COURT ORDERED, Motion GRANTED, noting ISI must be added as an additional party. Mr. Zhong to prepare the order.
(0)
(0)T M M Inc (TMMI) Stock Research Links
TRUDEF Sterling
tictocktictock
tictocktictock
Scroll down for more posts ▼