what is more revealing sometimes >> then what is p

what is more revealing sometimes >> then what is posted
is when one arrives on a SMB and subsequent CONsistent interaction

we all know when PRO side arrived

CON side is interesting re: how dispersed @ specific times
over 3 distinct time frames

first is 2009 (September)

second is 2010 .. Feb/May and July

third is 2011 .. July

reminder >> re: 2010 .. May was specific to change out (set up) re: AF to WSB

at each level *entity's* CON side was stuck because as i myself discovered in Jan 2012 (post dolts)
>> there were a lot of originals who'd never deposited their certs >> not all .. but many

but of course by the time the CON side had figured this one out
they'd already pulled in their presumed heavy lifter (non interchangeable)
for the first hit piece in July 2010 (same month naughty nite would
pull in CSTI to aid and abet)

and who can forget the dolt's >> er >> *letter* not uploaded until
almost one year later re: P2O on 9.28.10

something i've never seen done b4 to any start up .. to say nothing
of CONfirming (circumstantially) well placed CONnections

that alone tells you just how deep this entity's abusive *position* was
by Sept 2010

we are approx 6 weeks away from that 4 year *anniversary*

P2O has survived .. and it is *thriving* ..

it's beyond clear to me that mgmt understands tactics and strategies

the jigsaw is almost complete ..

just a few more material events to be 8k'd off the checklist

as i've noted a few x previously .. for the first time (since a pubco and sans orchestration)
the clock is finally working in both mgmt's and investors' favor

4kids