Agreed on all accounts. Agreed that it was probab

Agreed on all accounts. Agreed that it was probably not guggs itself since it has far more to play around with than a measly 100,000 shares. I say that from the viewpoint of a major investor, not from my own measly amount of shares. Also totally agree that the DD needs to be real DD, and not from putting together random things that may or may not be true. Most of the time I have seen that those assumptions are like the calculation a+b+c+d+e = wtf.