It is the best q BY A MILE. But the spending of fu

It is the best q BY A MILE. But the spending of funds seems to be, in my view, a bit out of hand. Change in the SS after the spending that just occured has alarmed me a bit. Just saying it is for cheaper funding doesn't hold water with me. Yes you have to spend money to make money but I don't see some of the things as having been timed all that well. Now if ICPA pounds a a few qs that show 1-3 mil in revs then the ss would be just fine. But it is not to that point not yet and from what I have looked at not close. I think a little patience should have been displayed in order to keep costs low this past q. To really amplify the view of the growth. And then if in a q or after the annual you need, or, still want to provide such payouts or mention pay for individuals then so be it. I don't think any investor at that point would have a problem with it.... Well that's not true someone would but not many.