Great DD? Huh? The poster was asking questions for

Great DD? Huh? The poster was asking questions for which the answers are directly in most of the filings. If you think that browsing to a few online filings and asking questions for which the answers are obvious then I have some Florida swamp land you may be interested in.

The poster stated, "...Tom stated that they had an office in LA..." but actually it was merely a reference to a note to shareholders listing how the money they raised planned to be spent. Actually if you look closely at the filings there is a small difference in the depreciation values between the Q1 filing and the Q3 filing which could easily account for the alleged $8,000 spent on offices. I would not call this item an inconsistency or a lie, quit spinning deception here. It is only for the weak minded.

I myself do not applaud weak attempts at attacking management by way of flooding the board with a myriad questions about minute details in the unaudited quarterly filings, of which themselves are easily answered and mostly the answers already known. I am of the opinion that the 10K will silence all of the suspicion. But of course I am sure there will still be some who will take particular excerpts of the details in the filings out of context and spin them in a suggestive manner to try to make innuendos and deceit instead of making real claims and arguments and backing them up with proof. Weak.

GLTY

$RFMK