PP because *most* (clearly not all) recognize
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 07/28/2014 1:11:10 PM
PP
because *most* (clearly not all) recognize what was stated @ the
company's inception >> may be impacted with co.s EVOLUTION
concepts in transition >> aren't static .. they will evolve based on
feedback >> both external and internal
it's pretty clear for those who've done their DD >> exactly who gave feedback re: P2O over the last 5 years (including but not limited to NYSDEC)
but keep the focus (like bueno) on the past >> not the present .. or the future
it's all the CON side has left *imo*
which is why *many* (again not all) can recognize what has been achieved
in 5 years >> all of which >> both stock and company were *targets*
it is rather remarkable .. all the while done as a pubco >. with expenses
to satisfy dolt's prior one size fits all *requirements*
so tellingly noted (one piece anyway) via the last K
which *again* was CONveniently bypassed (topic) by the deep pocketed
hedgies' *trolls*
some of whom are on record (posts) showing total (clearly deliberate) cluelessness re: cost of being a publicly traded co. on the OTC
i particularly like those posts >> that Qs' aren't *audited*
August looks to be shaping up for the next *round*
i'll be documenting
4kids
because *most* (clearly not all) recognize what was stated @ the
company's inception >> may be impacted with co.s EVOLUTION
concepts in transition >> aren't static .. they will evolve based on
feedback >> both external and internal
it's pretty clear for those who've done their DD >> exactly who gave feedback re: P2O over the last 5 years (including but not limited to NYSDEC)
but keep the focus (like bueno) on the past >> not the present .. or the future
it's all the CON side has left *imo*
which is why *many* (again not all) can recognize what has been achieved
in 5 years >> all of which >> both stock and company were *targets*
it is rather remarkable .. all the while done as a pubco >. with expenses
to satisfy dolt's prior one size fits all *requirements*
so tellingly noted (one piece anyway) via the last K
which *again* was CONveniently bypassed (topic) by the deep pocketed
hedgies' *trolls*
some of whom are on record (posts) showing total (clearly deliberate) cluelessness re: cost of being a publicly traded co. on the OTC
i particularly like those posts >> that Qs' aren't *audited*
August looks to be shaping up for the next *round*
i'll be documenting
4kids
(0)
(0)