PP because *most* (clearly not all) recognize

PP

because *most* (clearly not all) recognize what was stated @ the
company's inception >> may be impacted with co.s EVOLUTION

concepts in transition >> aren't static .. they will evolve based on
feedback >> both external and internal

it's pretty clear for those who've done their DD >> exactly who gave feedback re: P2O over the last 5 years (including but not limited to NYSDEC)

but keep the focus (like bueno) on the past >> not the present .. or the future

it's all the CON side has left *imo*

which is why *many* (again not all) can recognize what has been achieved
in 5 years >> all of which >> both stock and company were *targets*

it is rather remarkable .. all the while done as a pubco >. with expenses
to satisfy dolt's prior one size fits all *requirements*

so tellingly noted (one piece anyway) via the last K

which *again* was CONveniently bypassed (topic) by the deep pocketed
hedgies' *trolls*

some of whom are on record (posts) showing total (clearly deliberate) cluelessness re: cost of being a publicly traded co. on the OTC

i particularly like those posts >> that Qs' aren't *audited*

August looks to be shaping up for the next *round*

i'll be documenting

4kids