Don't you think it is kind of hypocritical though,
Post# of 36729
Posted On: 07/25/2014 12:31:19 PM
Don't you think it is kind of hypocritical though, to be criticizing those who have continued to point out the issues facing SKTO/AEGY, but it was perfectly okay that you posted, for weeks and weeks, the same 10-15 posts, in bunches, twice a day (within the HUB rules), on the SKTO board, twisting some of the very things that have in fact been shown (by Bells and others, and ultimately by the SEC's actions) to be false, in an effort to foster momentum in the stock's price and volume activity, while pushing information that proved to be more true and valuable for investors to the background?
It didn't seem a big issue to try and lure investors into buying shares that you may have been selling, but it's a big issue now that the information is kept in the forefront to make sure any new buyers are aware of EXACTLY what the situation is that they're buying into?
Look...ultimately it's buyer beware. But to be forewarned is to be forearmed. As this has played out, those who warned were doing many a favor. Those who didn't heed, are angry about it. Bells played with house money, warning of what could be coming, but 100% aware that if the hunches were right, it would probably cost him most if not all of that free-riding cash. His/Her choice.
IMO
It didn't seem a big issue to try and lure investors into buying shares that you may have been selling, but it's a big issue now that the information is kept in the forefront to make sure any new buyers are aware of EXACTLY what the situation is that they're buying into?
Look...ultimately it's buyer beware. But to be forewarned is to be forearmed. As this has played out, those who warned were doing many a favor. Those who didn't heed, are angry about it. Bells played with house money, warning of what could be coming, but 100% aware that if the hunches were right, it would probably cost him most if not all of that free-riding cash. His/Her choice.
IMO
(0)
(0)