Good post. But, of late I'm starting to have a mor
Post# of 9964
Posted On: 07/24/2014 6:19:05 PM
Good post. But, of late I'm starting to have a more negative view on this:
That's the ROSY view. There is a DARKER view which, as I become more the pessimist with each passing day, is how I'm starting to see things.
What if the product is just a legal reason to incorporate, become a penny stock, sell shares, get a large salary and live the good life as a One Percenter. And, hell, one doesn't even have to be successful, as Marani 1.0 is proof enough. And so, up starts Marani 2.0. And right away:
And I have been thinking along similar lines when you said this:
Frankly, I have been thinking for a while now that some of the bashers THEMSELVES might have lost money and that is why they bash. But, jsut the same, if what you say is possible then it might also be possible that such a former investor might be given them FACTUAL INFORMATION about what Marani 1.0 did the first time and failed and the bashers are simply the messengers. But, again, I dunno and am just speculating. (Can you imagine owning a bunch of shares when, as CJ tells us, they were at $2.00!!) Oh, but what I DO know is that the bashers have correctly predicted this low pps for quite sometime now. Coincidence or is history repeating itself?
Sure hope so.
But I've come to this conclusion, and really DO hope I'm proved wrong with this. But the bashers seem to have the answers while the pumpers seem to just have excuses.
Quote:
I see the company as a kitchen table company. One that is started by friends or family with an idea or product. The first time thru didn't work out but the idea or product was strong enough to try again. I like that.
That's the ROSY view. There is a DARKER view which, as I become more the pessimist with each passing day, is how I'm starting to see things.
What if the product is just a legal reason to incorporate, become a penny stock, sell shares, get a large salary and live the good life as a One Percenter. And, hell, one doesn't even have to be successful, as Marani 1.0 is proof enough. And so, up starts Marani 2.0. And right away:
Quote:Not that I know, but I'm assuming the money owed was for salary? And, come to think of it, does Margrit and family actually have ANY skin in this game? (And don'; teven get me started about Eco and the millions of shares they got for thousands in debt.)
On September 30, and October 1, 2013 the Company issued 6,500,000 of its preferred shares to its President, Margrit Eyraud and 500,000 of its preferred shares to its Secretary, Ara Zartarian, in return for their canceling $760,000 and $188,000 of the Company's obligations to them, respectively.
And I have been thinking along similar lines when you said this:
Quote:
The bashers are very organized and deliberate in their assault on the company and share price. I can only think they are bankrolled by someone who lost on the first time Marani tried.
Frankly, I have been thinking for a while now that some of the bashers THEMSELVES might have lost money and that is why they bash. But, jsut the same, if what you say is possible then it might also be possible that such a former investor might be given them FACTUAL INFORMATION about what Marani 1.0 did the first time and failed and the bashers are simply the messengers. But, again, I dunno and am just speculating. (Can you imagine owning a bunch of shares when, as CJ tells us, they were at $2.00!!) Oh, but what I DO know is that the bashers have correctly predicted this low pps for quite sometime now. Coincidence or is history repeating itself?
Quote:
News tonight that could be a real changer.
Sure hope so.
But I've come to this conclusion, and really DO hope I'm proved wrong with this. But the bashers seem to have the answers while the pumpers seem to just have excuses.
(0)
(0)