Here is the thing. iGlow was never the problem. Be
Post# of 36729
Posted On: 07/19/2014 9:18:03 AM
Here is the thing. iGlow was never the problem. Benz and management were the problem. iGlow didn't get these companies suspended. Benz and management did.
What I find sad is that many of the most ardent iGlow haters lost the most money here. That hate was misplaced. Besides his vile, iGlow offered a checklist of things for management to correct. Instead of correcting, or clarifying matters, they chose to go after iGlow. This was misplaced.
Had they addressed shareholders questions and concerns, then I would think differently. Unfortunately, they didn't answer my questions and concerns. From Hipple showing up on filings to misleading and false prs. These things should have been handled in a transparent fashion. That's what you get when a lawyer is running the show from a litigious perspective. A lawyer who was scoring 6 figures while many investors were losing 6 figures.
The prs show just how out of touch these guys were:
"We have received communications of tremendous support from shareholders for our prior shareholder letters of today's date, for which we thank those shareholders."
Huh
"We believe we have fully disclosed all material items in our filings and are not aware of any material omissions or misstatements in those reports. We are unaware of any activity in the trading of our stock that could create concern. We are communicating with the SEC to elicit and answer any questions they may have."
Yeah right. Ok maybe they needed to save face but this is total bs
What I find sad is that many of the most ardent iGlow haters lost the most money here. That hate was misplaced. Besides his vile, iGlow offered a checklist of things for management to correct. Instead of correcting, or clarifying matters, they chose to go after iGlow. This was misplaced.
Had they addressed shareholders questions and concerns, then I would think differently. Unfortunately, they didn't answer my questions and concerns. From Hipple showing up on filings to misleading and false prs. These things should have been handled in a transparent fashion. That's what you get when a lawyer is running the show from a litigious perspective. A lawyer who was scoring 6 figures while many investors were losing 6 figures.
The prs show just how out of touch these guys were:
"We have received communications of tremendous support from shareholders for our prior shareholder letters of today's date, for which we thank those shareholders."
Huh
"We believe we have fully disclosed all material items in our filings and are not aware of any material omissions or misstatements in those reports. We are unaware of any activity in the trading of our stock that could create concern. We are communicating with the SEC to elicit and answer any questions they may have."
Yeah right. Ok maybe they needed to save face but this is total bs
(0)
(0)