that was the reason... and back then they were say
Post# of 41413
Posted On: 07/13/2014 11:05:20 PM
Re: The Lieutenant #5425
that was the reason... and back then they were saying that they would be up and running in 6 months... lol
Dilution has killed that. Barry was at that point 60-80 at takeoff. obviously that has been dumbed down a bit. I still rely on my profitability analysis from the proforma. A year ago, I has pegged 58 cents at one year mark. The beauty of the analysis was in the 90 million of NOL's the company has stored up, which will be larger by about 20-25% than last year, but revenue growth remains the same and S/O are higher, so if I took a swag at my analysis, which I still have some notes on, then we would see roughly a value of 47 in on year. Not counting for news or trading related spikes that could send it higher for brief moments.
Dilution has killed that. Barry was at that point 60-80 at takeoff. obviously that has been dumbed down a bit. I still rely on my profitability analysis from the proforma. A year ago, I has pegged 58 cents at one year mark. The beauty of the analysis was in the 90 million of NOL's the company has stored up, which will be larger by about 20-25% than last year, but revenue growth remains the same and S/O are higher, so if I took a swag at my analysis, which I still have some notes on, then we would see roughly a value of 47 in on year. Not counting for news or trading related spikes that could send it higher for brief moments.
(0)
(0)Baltia Air Lines Inc (BLTA) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼