I'm not sure ANY SMB site has a READ ONLY feature
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 07/11/2014 7:44:37 AM
I'm not sure ANY SMB site has a READ ONLY feature that blocks copying content.
Some (like hangout) automatically imbed the source information with the information copied... but that is easily removed once pasted info is being prepared for posting.
It is best to count on ANYTHING SAID being seen by TROLLS and USED IF POSSIBLE for the greatest harm. Of course, SOME OF THEIR FANTASIES that follow are totally absurd nonsense.
That nonsense is sometimes NOT REALIZED for what it is by new eyes looking at JBI or by the occasional lurker checking on anything new. Hard to say if lurkers are shareholders or just curious spectators.
FOR REAL!!! On the 8th, I exchanged 5 PMs with a lurker who has been around quite some time YEARS... and has some opinions IN STONE that are hard to understand. He was actually surprised I replied civilly to his first PM... I too am surprised because I am suspicious of such "out of the blue" contacts about JBI these days. And I am NOT usually the most civil Long around.
Turns out he is an attorney with 30+ years practicing in the system, has seen untold fraud and corruption, is doubtful JBI has a processor that is viable for pyrolysis, does not buy all of the conspiracy theory about JBII manipulation. Thinks most trolls are not compensated but James Randi-style debunkers who have to prove themselves right. He does not think there is enough money in play in penny stocks to have an "on-payroll" team manipulating them.
Has unfavorable opinions of Z's and PP's posting histories and is sick of them, but then is skeptical about another LT JBII Long who is a prolific defender but has been involved with several OTC stocks that went under. He is torn by "bright but misguided" or "more actively culpable" in events that transpired.
Says a processor sale will AMAZE HIM.
Personally, I'd bet he will BUY JBII shares IF there is a processor sale announced... just because the story has intrigued him for almost as long as it has been unfolding. He knows most of the history of JBI as well as many longs do.
Some (like hangout) automatically imbed the source information with the information copied... but that is easily removed once pasted info is being prepared for posting.
It is best to count on ANYTHING SAID being seen by TROLLS and USED IF POSSIBLE for the greatest harm. Of course, SOME OF THEIR FANTASIES that follow are totally absurd nonsense.
That nonsense is sometimes NOT REALIZED for what it is by new eyes looking at JBI or by the occasional lurker checking on anything new. Hard to say if lurkers are shareholders or just curious spectators.
FOR REAL!!! On the 8th, I exchanged 5 PMs with a lurker who has been around quite some time YEARS... and has some opinions IN STONE that are hard to understand. He was actually surprised I replied civilly to his first PM... I too am surprised because I am suspicious of such "out of the blue" contacts about JBI these days. And I am NOT usually the most civil Long around.
Turns out he is an attorney with 30+ years practicing in the system, has seen untold fraud and corruption, is doubtful JBI has a processor that is viable for pyrolysis, does not buy all of the conspiracy theory about JBII manipulation. Thinks most trolls are not compensated but James Randi-style debunkers who have to prove themselves right. He does not think there is enough money in play in penny stocks to have an "on-payroll" team manipulating them.
Has unfavorable opinions of Z's and PP's posting histories and is sick of them, but then is skeptical about another LT JBII Long who is a prolific defender but has been involved with several OTC stocks that went under. He is torn by "bright but misguided" or "more actively culpable" in events that transpired.
Says a processor sale will AMAZE HIM.
Personally, I'd bet he will BUY JBII shares IF there is a processor sale announced... just because the story has intrigued him for almost as long as it has been unfolding. He knows most of the history of JBI as well as many longs do.
(0)
(0)