If you want my attention, you should reply to me.
Post# of 5949
Posted On: 07/08/2014 3:21:21 PM
If you want my attention, you should reply to me. Otherwise, I might not see it.
The entire BCAP thing is shady from the very beginning. Dwyer appoints Schneider as his puppet, structures two very large share structure deals (750m and 800m), and then spins off RIGH in a R/M with BG. Then, he cashes in the first loan of 750 million shares, "cashed in above market value" (meaning, *he cashed in those shares for more than the value of the loan), next he doesn't file the quarterly report indicating the value in which he cashed in those shares, (but the T/A knows exactly how much he got paid). Next, he expects to get paid $210K (800m) more, plus interest for the second loan Dwyer structured with Schnieder while RIGH was RightSmile, Inc. Why do you think Dwyer hasn't taken this thing to court yet? Shady. Printing a few pieces of evidence on OTC means nothing. Now do you see why Angel has publicly stated he has completely distanced himself from BCAP and prior management?
The entire BCAP thing is shady from the very beginning. Dwyer appoints Schneider as his puppet, structures two very large share structure deals (750m and 800m), and then spins off RIGH in a R/M with BG. Then, he cashes in the first loan of 750 million shares, "cashed in above market value" (meaning, *he cashed in those shares for more than the value of the loan), next he doesn't file the quarterly report indicating the value in which he cashed in those shares, (but the T/A knows exactly how much he got paid). Next, he expects to get paid $210K (800m) more, plus interest for the second loan Dwyer structured with Schnieder while RIGH was RightSmile, Inc. Why do you think Dwyer hasn't taken this thing to court yet? Shady. Printing a few pieces of evidence on OTC means nothing. Now do you see why Angel has publicly stated he has completely distanced himself from BCAP and prior management?
(0)
(0)