I posted the following on LieHub earlier: So, i
Post# of 39368
Posted On: 07/03/2014 12:10:14 AM
I posted the following on LieHub earlier:
So, is it possible to stay on topic this time if we are going to discuss this Hallin filing? If so, here we go:
(1) In the US Court system, is it possible for a party to make any allegation they wish?
(2) In a non-jury trial, in general, doesn't a Judges ruling represent the paramount point of a trial?
(3) In the filing from Hallin, absent of taking just a couple of yet to be PROVEN points (#8-14) by themselves and extrapolating a uneducated result.....the only already proven factual part of the filing would relate to items #1-7.
(4) Related to items #1-7, Treaty emerged on most if not all of these item as hands down victorious. Treaty really could not have hoped for a better result than what they have seen thus far in this case.
(5) In order for either party to be victorious in the next phase....the first phase is over and done with, victory for Treaty....the burden of proof will be with both parties to win this second phase.
(6) So far the court has unanimously sided with Treaty at all turns in this case. The Judge will need to do an about face to change this course.
(7) Anything else, including comments about Treaty not cooperating or skeletons has no bearing at this point....July 23rd is D-day for both parties.
Let's keep on point....focus.....no need to discuss anything other than what is related directly to this case.
Bronco
So, is it possible to stay on topic this time if we are going to discuss this Hallin filing? If so, here we go:
(1) In the US Court system, is it possible for a party to make any allegation they wish?
(2) In a non-jury trial, in general, doesn't a Judges ruling represent the paramount point of a trial?
(3) In the filing from Hallin, absent of taking just a couple of yet to be PROVEN points (#8-14) by themselves and extrapolating a uneducated result.....the only already proven factual part of the filing would relate to items #1-7.
(4) Related to items #1-7, Treaty emerged on most if not all of these item as hands down victorious. Treaty really could not have hoped for a better result than what they have seen thus far in this case.
(5) In order for either party to be victorious in the next phase....the first phase is over and done with, victory for Treaty....the burden of proof will be with both parties to win this second phase.
(6) So far the court has unanimously sided with Treaty at all turns in this case. The Judge will need to do an about face to change this course.
(7) Anything else, including comments about Treaty not cooperating or skeletons has no bearing at this point....July 23rd is D-day for both parties.
Let's keep on point....focus.....no need to discuss anything other than what is related directly to this case.
Bronco
(0)
(0)