Big White Dog is right. Liehub is very corrupt and they are systematically eliminating positive posters to the KMAG board there. Do not respong to any of the JSO. If you must post to the Liehub board only respond directley to those you know that have skin in the game and are share holders. If you feel compelled to reply to any of the JSO's post do not do it directley, copy and aste what you want to respond to then respond to that in your post not directed towards anybody, once the JSO replyes to that (your) post and if you feel compelled to answer back, do not reply directley back.
FYI
All of these posts were removed for TOS violations, then used to place a restriction
_______________________________________________________
I guess those unaudited numbers are only important when they are needed to spread bs, but for anything positive they are then meaningless because they are unaudited.......lmao
Now who would have thought that huh?
_______________________________________________________
Heck, that's nothing. I am still waiting for documented proof that a float lock "has NEVER happened," along with documented proof that the SEC has appointed you as their spokesperson
_______________________________________________________
I beg your pardon. Another thing with no documented proof. They are piling up
_______________________________________________________
A little something to think about. Board marks are a significant indicator of how poor a company is when some disappear, however when they climb and surpass the old mark, well that does not really mean anything. lol
_______________________________________________________
Best of luck to you
_______________________________________________________
How about them board marks, when some disappeared they became "legit." and now that they have risen past the old mark they seem to no be so "legit" any longer?......lmao
_______________________________________________________
"It is going to be interesting to see those audited fins. You've got that right I have long suspected that the "revenues" were r-pac's revenues to some degree...and not just the royalties they were claiming. Thanks for the opinion The last two times I have seen audited fins come out from a subpenny stock ( one grey) the reality relative to what was reported in the past was significantly different. Has nothing to do with KMAG
I suspect if that is the case here IF!!!!!... It will be ignored in favor of the narrative that the Form 10 was simply filed. LOL, everybody has been saying "where is the form 10, now when it comes?????...LMAO
He was claiming huge growth when comparing YOY quarters...but as we all saw that quarter over quarter "growth" had stalled and just before that was going to show in no longer being able to claim the huge YOY quarterly comparisons he stopped releasing any financials. but the battle cry has been "unaudited", NOW the numbers are important????.....lmao
A Form 10 can be a double edged sword as another, still grey, pinkie discovered. my guess is the ones that get cut by that sword will be disappearing in a heartbeat...and I highly doubt that it will be KMAG share holders...lol"
_______________________________________________________
I am expecting some very nice things to be taking place in KMAG land this coming week.
2 things really stand out,
1. "it's NEVER happened"
2. "I write stories, so what does that tell you"
Any inquiring minds, just pm and ask.
KMAG rising and there is nothing anybody can do about it!!!!!!
_______________________________________________________
Briliant post, great job.......lol
_______________________________________________________
"Yes, I do think that. I've had lots of experience with stocks whose hardcore shareholders think they've "locked the float"."
"It's never been true."
I guess you are right, you did not say it never happened. But if "it's NEVER been true" what exactely does that mean other than "it NEVER happened!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And since you admitted that you cannot back your staement up with proof, well you know.....
_______________________________________________________
All of the above posts were made back in response to the JSO group, every one of them were removed by Liehub admin a day or 2 later then a restriction placed on posting. All one of the mods on the Liehub board has to do is look at the disparity of the posts that get removed, of course some of them are legitimate TOS violations, but not all of them. The ratio of posts being removed are vastly legitiamte share holders posts and very, very few of the JSO posts get removed, even though many of them do violate the TOS of Liehub as based on the reasons Liehub has provided in the past on why posts got removed.
.
FYI
All of these posts were removed for TOS violations, then used to place a restriction
_______________________________________________________
I guess those unaudited numbers are only important when they are needed to spread bs, but for anything positive they are then meaningless because they are unaudited.......lmao
Now who would have thought that huh?
_______________________________________________________
Heck, that's nothing. I am still waiting for documented proof that a float lock "has NEVER happened," along with documented proof that the SEC has appointed you as their spokesperson
_______________________________________________________
I beg your pardon. Another thing with no documented proof. They are piling up
_______________________________________________________
A little something to think about. Board marks are a significant indicator of how poor a company is when some disappear, however when they climb and surpass the old mark, well that does not really mean anything. lol
_______________________________________________________
Best of luck to you
_______________________________________________________
How about them board marks, when some disappeared they became "legit." and now that they have risen past the old mark they seem to no be so "legit" any longer?......lmao
_______________________________________________________
"It is going to be interesting to see those audited fins. You've got that right I have long suspected that the "revenues" were r-pac's revenues to some degree...and not just the royalties they were claiming. Thanks for the opinion The last two times I have seen audited fins come out from a subpenny stock ( one grey) the reality relative to what was reported in the past was significantly different. Has nothing to do with KMAG
I suspect if that is the case here IF!!!!!... It will be ignored in favor of the narrative that the Form 10 was simply filed. LOL, everybody has been saying "where is the form 10, now when it comes?????...LMAO
He was claiming huge growth when comparing YOY quarters...but as we all saw that quarter over quarter "growth" had stalled and just before that was going to show in no longer being able to claim the huge YOY quarterly comparisons he stopped releasing any financials. but the battle cry has been "unaudited", NOW the numbers are important????.....lmao
A Form 10 can be a double edged sword as another, still grey, pinkie discovered. my guess is the ones that get cut by that sword will be disappearing in a heartbeat...and I highly doubt that it will be KMAG share holders...lol"
_______________________________________________________
I am expecting some very nice things to be taking place in KMAG land this coming week.
2 things really stand out,
1. "it's NEVER happened"
2. "I write stories, so what does that tell you"
Any inquiring minds, just pm and ask.
KMAG rising and there is nothing anybody can do about it!!!!!!
_______________________________________________________
Briliant post, great job.......lol
_______________________________________________________
"Yes, I do think that. I've had lots of experience with stocks whose hardcore shareholders think they've "locked the float"."
"It's never been true."
I guess you are right, you did not say it never happened. But if "it's NEVER been true" what exactely does that mean other than "it NEVER happened!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! And since you admitted that you cannot back your staement up with proof, well you know.....
_______________________________________________________
All of the above posts were made back in response to the JSO group, every one of them were removed by Liehub admin a day or 2 later then a restriction placed on posting. All one of the mods on the Liehub board has to do is look at the disparity of the posts that get removed, of course some of them are legitimate TOS violations, but not all of them. The ratio of posts being removed are vastly legitiamte share holders posts and very, very few of the JSO posts get removed, even though many of them do violate the TOS of Liehub as based on the reasons Liehub has provided in the past on why posts got removed.
.
