In previous posts I have said that I believed that
Post# of 56324
Posted On: 06/24/2014 4:41:17 PM
In previous posts I have said that I believed that a possible stock buyback strategy may include insiders selling large blocks of shares just prior to licensing or immediately after then use proceeds to buy cheap shares resulting from a corresponding drop in PPS (due to heavy selling volume).
The factor that has been miscalculated IMO, is the timeline to receive licensing. This presents a unique opportunity for retail buyers (us) because after the upcoming conference it is likely PPS will go up then significantly drop unless insiders selling stocks decide to hold back those shares until after licensing and then slowly introduce them into the market..
The question that needs to be asked is this.
Why would insiders sell hundreds of millions of shares into the market pre-license if the share value is expected to jump up in value after license occurs?
The only answer I can come up with is the revenue share agreement .
Any thought, comments, etc. I appreciate your input.
The factor that has been miscalculated IMO, is the timeline to receive licensing. This presents a unique opportunity for retail buyers (us) because after the upcoming conference it is likely PPS will go up then significantly drop unless insiders selling stocks decide to hold back those shares until after licensing and then slowly introduce them into the market..
The question that needs to be asked is this.
Why would insiders sell hundreds of millions of shares into the market pre-license if the share value is expected to jump up in value after license occurs?
The only answer I can come up with is the revenue share agreement .
Any thought, comments, etc. I appreciate your input.
(0)
(0)