In answer to Golfgod's question below: " I hav
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 06/23/2014 7:00:41 PM
In answer to Golfgod's question below:
"
I have a question for...
1) HeptoCloud
2) GET A GRIP
3) yuggibeht
4) mamatmapaul
5) It takes a brain
6) Paper Prophet
7) SaulGoodman
Why do you have sooooo much interest in JBI and John Bordynuik that you are compelled to spend your days here posting on this site? It's my understanding that most (if not all) of you are not shareholders. Can you all please take the time to explain this to any new readers that may be thinking of investing in JBII. Also, please include why you only post regarding negative information, but leave out the positives?
People without their heads up their asses want to know!
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1606...sPIh"
I have a strong interest in JBI and John Bordynuik as a kind of case study in a bad OTC stock. If it is not an outright scam (which I think it is not), it is an example of bad management, narcisism, and a really poor investment. More importantly, it is one hell of a case study in investor psycology (the inability to sell). Been there done that.
So it is a hobby... I come back to it from time to time during the day.
I am not being paid to post.
I am here to educate, assist in making decisions. etc.
A management gets closer to execution... the % loss with each downward movement gets larger!!!
New readers are the point!! That is, if they have the misfortune to actually be relying on a message board for their stock picks. They should hear all opinions from everyone, as much as the poster takes time to post.. within reason. I don't mind limits to number of posts per day as long as it is reasonable.
And why would a reader find it strange that not all the posters are shareholders?? Most people are smart enough to know when someone is trying to sel lthem something, and accordingly, take the info with a grain of salt and some skepticism? Being a shareholder or not has nothing to do with anything..
And the reason why we only post negative information is because there is nothing positive to post. This company is headed for financial disaster, if not already there. They will have to do a Reverse Split or some other form of business reorganization. So, by definition there is nothing positive to say. It is a total failure.
And for the record, TBG has posted positively about this stock. At one point Janice Shell called Bordynuik a "stock promoter". TBG corrected her, said that that was unfair, and that he was indeed a CEO. Your statement is not quite correct.
"
I have a question for...
1) HeptoCloud
2) GET A GRIP
3) yuggibeht
4) mamatmapaul
5) It takes a brain
6) Paper Prophet
7) SaulGoodman
Why do you have sooooo much interest in JBI and John Bordynuik that you are compelled to spend your days here posting on this site? It's my understanding that most (if not all) of you are not shareholders. Can you all please take the time to explain this to any new readers that may be thinking of investing in JBII. Also, please include why you only post regarding negative information, but leave out the positives?
People without their heads up their asses want to know!
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1606...sPIh"
I have a strong interest in JBI and John Bordynuik as a kind of case study in a bad OTC stock. If it is not an outright scam (which I think it is not), it is an example of bad management, narcisism, and a really poor investment. More importantly, it is one hell of a case study in investor psycology (the inability to sell). Been there done that.
So it is a hobby... I come back to it from time to time during the day.
I am not being paid to post.
I am here to educate, assist in making decisions. etc.
A management gets closer to execution... the % loss with each downward movement gets larger!!!
New readers are the point!! That is, if they have the misfortune to actually be relying on a message board for their stock picks. They should hear all opinions from everyone, as much as the poster takes time to post.. within reason. I don't mind limits to number of posts per day as long as it is reasonable.
And why would a reader find it strange that not all the posters are shareholders?? Most people are smart enough to know when someone is trying to sel lthem something, and accordingly, take the info with a grain of salt and some skepticism? Being a shareholder or not has nothing to do with anything..
And the reason why we only post negative information is because there is nothing positive to post. This company is headed for financial disaster, if not already there. They will have to do a Reverse Split or some other form of business reorganization. So, by definition there is nothing positive to say. It is a total failure.
And for the record, TBG has posted positively about this stock. At one point Janice Shell called Bordynuik a "stock promoter". TBG corrected her, said that that was unfair, and that he was indeed a CEO. Your statement is not quite correct.
(0)
(0)