HPNN. Its all about the "Have Made" IPR baby! 2 t

HPNN. Its all about the "Have Made" IPR baby! 2 types of liscences Make Use Sell and Have Made. Right now the money isn't in Hop-on making stuff themselves like ecigs, phones, etc. That is all commoditized and undercut by the Chinese. Now the patches could/should have higer margins at least until they become commoditized as well.
The $ is in using all the liscenses and their patent portfolio to aid the Chinese that are illegally making products that they don't have the proper IPRs to make.
These manufacturing companies are getting shut down and or fined...this is where Hop-On comes in with their custom Have Made IPR solutions. Some Chinese don't want to go through a direct liscencing deal with Microsoft, Nokia, ALU, etc. for fear of paying penalties and past royalties. They don't want their books audited and or strike up deals with a direct competitor in many cases. Plus those worldwide liscenses take a lot of time to make.
When Peter M. says they (Chinese manufacturers) don't want to disrupt their local distribution by creating worldwide liscences this is what he may be referencing. HPNN. Post by gakman. HPNN.