ITAB >> what is remarkable is how factually fa
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 06/20/2014 2:57:54 PM
ITAB >>
what is remarkable is how factually false your posts CONcerning me are
was this line missed in that thread with PP?
http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1599669
===================
Quote:
I understand now. Would you say you're up on your investment?
If course he/she/it/they would say they are. If you had the skills to see through the "smoke and mirrors", you would find that JBII was still trading at $6.00, the same price at which they started loading up.
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1599...z35CsAeldx
============
i never go all in to any stock regardless of where traded
my very first buy in JBII was in Nov 2009
as is my way .. i dipped my toe *cautiously*
100 shares @ 1.12
i watched (sort of) the *run* in Dec 2009
i posted in the spring of 2010 that there was no way JB would
be able to uplist with the *firm* doing co.s audits @ the NAZ
(this is where *knowledge* of the process helps)
hence my expectation of a change out of firms (WSB)
and my comments contemporaneously (May 2010)
that that ah's filing was the moment the *entity* was salivating for
as in taking the PPS down on less than 900,000 in *volume* approx
4 bux
there were 2 aspects i wasn't aware of in 2010
the first was that original investors hadn't registered their shares
(not all but many)
meaning they couldn't be accessed
what is remarkable is why an *entity* like RBC would take certs
done at 80c .. but then not allow additional buys >> only sells
the second aspect was the *knowledge* of the crew working
the vehicle of choice re: OTC stock manipulation (PRO/CON)
with both sides well represented
that revelation didn't occur in total >> till Feb 2012
i look at P2O as a giant jig saw puzzle with about 80% now known
suspect another 10% percent to be filled in (for the most part)
this year (2014)
the last 10% doesn't pertain to the company .. rather the entity
who orchestrates UP and DOWN
i see that exposure in due course .. when other factors come into play
4kids
what is remarkable is how factually false your posts CONcerning me are
was this line missed in that thread with PP?
Quote:
no i wouldn't
http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1599669
===================
Quote:
I understand now. Would you say you're up on your investment?
If course he/she/it/they would say they are. If you had the skills to see through the "smoke and mirrors", you would find that JBII was still trading at $6.00, the same price at which they started loading up.
Read More: http://investorshangout.com/post/view?id=1599...z35CsAeldx
============
i never go all in to any stock regardless of where traded
my very first buy in JBII was in Nov 2009
as is my way .. i dipped my toe *cautiously*
100 shares @ 1.12
i watched (sort of) the *run* in Dec 2009
i posted in the spring of 2010 that there was no way JB would
be able to uplist with the *firm* doing co.s audits @ the NAZ
(this is where *knowledge* of the process helps)
hence my expectation of a change out of firms (WSB)
and my comments contemporaneously (May 2010)
that that ah's filing was the moment the *entity* was salivating for
as in taking the PPS down on less than 900,000 in *volume* approx
4 bux
there were 2 aspects i wasn't aware of in 2010
the first was that original investors hadn't registered their shares
(not all but many)
meaning they couldn't be accessed
what is remarkable is why an *entity* like RBC would take certs
done at 80c .. but then not allow additional buys >> only sells
the second aspect was the *knowledge* of the crew working
the vehicle of choice re: OTC stock manipulation (PRO/CON)
with both sides well represented
that revelation didn't occur in total >> till Feb 2012
i look at P2O as a giant jig saw puzzle with about 80% now known
suspect another 10% percent to be filled in (for the most part)
this year (2014)
the last 10% doesn't pertain to the company .. rather the entity
who orchestrates UP and DOWN
i see that exposure in due course .. when other factors come into play
4kids
(0)
(0)