Thanks for the info fitz! You may find this article interesting. Also, included is a video explaining who pays the costs of student loan forgiveness and in my opinion a great debate for and against student loans.
Today must be student loan day in President Obama’s “year of action” – also “year of midterm elections” – as the President announced he will expand eligibility for student loan repayment capping and forgiveness. In addition, this week the Senate is set to take up Elizabeth Warren’s (D-MA) bill to federally refinance student loans at lower interest rates, including truly private loans.
Let’s review the folly of such seemingly well-intentioned efforts:
Making student loans cheaper, which includes indicating that Washington will always soften your loan terms if politically possible, mainly encourages students to demand more stuff, and colleges to charge more. They’re called “perverse incentives.”
In the name of helping them, federal politicians, and many other people, massively oversell higher education to the detriment of students. Perhaps as much as half of people who enter college don’t finish; a third of people with a bachelor’s degree are in jobs not requiring the credential; underemployment is even worse for graduate-degree holders, and; cheap college has almost certainly fueled credential inflation, not major increases in knowledge or skills.
Decreasing what borrowers will repay means taxpayers – who had no choice in whether the loans were made – have to make up the difference. And there is a little matter of being nearly $18 trillion in debt already.
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness program encourages people to work for not-for-profit entities, especially government. As if government work were a major sacrifice, and things produced or operated for profit such as iPads, grocery stores, bicycles, door knobs, restaurants, books, airplanes, and on and on, didn’t make us better off.
Someday, I hope somebody’s “year of action” will finally deal with the crippling reality of federal student aid “help.” But that will only happen if the public gets tired of sweet-sounding “solutions,” especially in years of elections.
http://www.cato.org/blog/student-loan-gifts-dont-help
Further explanation of who would pay for the student loan forgiveness:
http://www.cato.org/multimedia/video-highligh...wttg-fox-5
And a debate regarding student loans:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qweLgTNcnng
Today must be student loan day in President Obama’s “year of action” – also “year of midterm elections” – as the President announced he will expand eligibility for student loan repayment capping and forgiveness. In addition, this week the Senate is set to take up Elizabeth Warren’s (D-MA) bill to federally refinance student loans at lower interest rates, including truly private loans.
Let’s review the folly of such seemingly well-intentioned efforts:
Making student loans cheaper, which includes indicating that Washington will always soften your loan terms if politically possible, mainly encourages students to demand more stuff, and colleges to charge more. They’re called “perverse incentives.”
In the name of helping them, federal politicians, and many other people, massively oversell higher education to the detriment of students. Perhaps as much as half of people who enter college don’t finish; a third of people with a bachelor’s degree are in jobs not requiring the credential; underemployment is even worse for graduate-degree holders, and; cheap college has almost certainly fueled credential inflation, not major increases in knowledge or skills.
Decreasing what borrowers will repay means taxpayers – who had no choice in whether the loans were made – have to make up the difference. And there is a little matter of being nearly $18 trillion in debt already.
The Public Service Loan Forgiveness program encourages people to work for not-for-profit entities, especially government. As if government work were a major sacrifice, and things produced or operated for profit such as iPads, grocery stores, bicycles, door knobs, restaurants, books, airplanes, and on and on, didn’t make us better off.
Someday, I hope somebody’s “year of action” will finally deal with the crippling reality of federal student aid “help.” But that will only happen if the public gets tired of sweet-sounding “solutions,” especially in years of elections.
http://www.cato.org/blog/student-loan-gifts-dont-help
Further explanation of who would pay for the student loan forgiveness:
http://www.cato.org/multimedia/video-highligh...wttg-fox-5
And a debate regarding student loans:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qweLgTNcnng
Recommended boards:
NASDAQ DIP and RIP
SHEEPWOLF'S $1,000,000.00 JOURNEY
Recommended literature:
Investing in One Lesson by Mark Skousen
A Viennese Waltz Down Wall Street by Mark Skousen
Trading by Numbers by Rick Swope and W. Shawn Howell
NASDAQ DIP and RIP
SHEEPWOLF'S $1,000,000.00 JOURNEY
Recommended literature:
Investing in One Lesson by Mark Skousen
A Viennese Waltz Down Wall Street by Mark Skousen
Trading by Numbers by Rick Swope and W. Shawn Howell
