GoGo-KittyGrrl Thursday, 06/12/14 06:20:30 PM

GoGo-KittyGrrl Thursday, 06/12/14 06:20:30 PM
Re: shawhub post# 22414
Post # of 22417

It is a positive thing, but if Gordon was heavily rewarded like Bruce Pollock was, that toxic history will continue to haunt us. I'd like to know how transparent the new CEO will be, and what he will do to make the shareholders whole again that got screwed over, which GESI is still liable for.

Gordon offered GESI up to the shareholders back in February. That's how long he's been wanting to get out of this mess. I have the email records to prove it. Bruce Pollock wasn't exactly happy with the idea, insisting that the "shell is worth money"

I'm still baffled as to what anything Bruce Pollock would say would have any impact on GESI. After all, court order prohibits him from having any position in a publicly traded company that would give him that kind of power (director or exec). He definitely seemed to have influence over Gordon and this company based on the emails I have.


I'm also curious about the rise in PPS leading up to this announcement. It looks like insider trading to me, and now that the PR is out, newish (and oldish) names wasted no time posting. Its almost as if this was expected or they were given warning of it?

There's something rotten in Denmark, and its not the cheese.

Quote:

---

Gordon offered GESI up to the shareholders back in February. That's how long he's been wanting to get out of this mess. I have the email records to prove it.

---

HMMMMMM...funny if that's a fact...that means every share holder was contacted for that proposal...I wasn't contacted about Gordon offering up the company to "the shareholders"...neither was my son...or others I know......yea that 1 might need some explanation....and I bet it opens up some other questions...that open up some other questions...that open up some other questions.....you see where this is headed right????

Quote: You don't have to step in bs....to know when your around it!