JBII News. . . Nothing new here, but interesti

Quote:

---

JBII News. . .

Nothing new here, but interesting nonetheless. . .

---

Hmmm...... IMHO, to post this "article" as the longs on this board are doing is an example of very poor DD (imho)

JBI paid this company to do this blurb. Somehow, this translates to "LOOK! Other parties out there have faith in JBI ...." or some such nonsense.

Quote:

---

The Group does not review, and is not responsible for confirming, the accuracy of documents pertaining to issuers that are publicly traded and information submitted to the Group for inclusion in SCS Websites. The issuers and their management are solely responsible for the accuracy of any information regarding their security that has been provided to the Group for dissemination in SCS Websites. INVESTORS ARE URGED TO CONFIRM THE ACCURACY OF ANY INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM SCS WEBSITES PRIOR TO MAKING ANY INVESTMENT DECISION.

---

This reminds me of the oft-mentioned and referenced "public document" that supposedly confirmed that "third parties" were actually talking about JBI selling processors for 8-9 million. Turns out the public document they were citing were minutes of the Madison County board meeting in which it was disclosed that JBI was in breach of contract and thus this wonderful agreement (a la RKT) was now void. The person who was in contact with JBI merely repeated that JBI told him that they would be selling processors now, and for 8-9 million. And this somehow is translated as third parties confirming in a very public document that the price of the processors were 8-9 million.

VERY POOR DD imho