The article I wrote on SeekingAlpha two and a half

The article I wrote on SeekingAlpha two and a half years ago which everyone here is referring to as a "hit piece" was entirely factually correct, links and all, and told investors exactly what they needed to know. Had anyone actually listened to what I was saying rather than fighting me because the article didn't pump their stock, they could have sold at $1.40 at that time rather than holding until now with a current ask of $0.10.

You people should be thanking me for giving you the information and the opportunity--it's your own fault that you didn't listen. I understand there is always conflicting information out there but I laid out everything very clearly in my article.

I also completely understand that my posting here doesn't do any good. Shareholders have been absolutely hammered and another $0.10 isn't going to make much of a difference, except maybe for those who are hell-bent on averaging down. Mostly I'm just talking about the company. Maybe as some investors move on to their next investment, my posting will have given them some insight in how to avoid being scammed in the future with a too-good-to-be-true 'technology'. I understand that's not going to help very many of the people here who are posting believing FUD is the problem with their penny stock.

Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.