wrong >> it's always been that way PP i do
Post# of 43064
Posted On: 06/07/2014 1:44:42 PM
Re: PaperProphet #8956
wrong >>
it's always been that way PP
i don't control *deletions* in total
but gee another drive by insult re: rogue moderator
how very non surprising
in order ..
the fact that you are unaware just how different this site is from lie hub
re: deletions
and the presumption that i wouldn't delete an investor's PA
whether you realize it or not >> i've done that more than a few times b4
i have zero respect for those who post on SMBs and don't carry their
alias over
it's deceitful
and again it's JMO >> and no you don't have to agree with it
but yep >> i do believe *trolls* litter various SMBs >> something
i've noted for years
re: cleaning up my act .. my act is clearly articulated re: beliefs
and it's why i've documented trading data (facts) on JBII for years
the last thing anyone would call me is passive/aggressive PP
see above
no one is stopping the discussion .. and the *fray* wasn't started by me
i'd suggest you go back and read this board from the beginning
it's only when lie hub did their latest that aspects *changed* here
as for my name being at the top of this board .. it wouldn't matter
if it was my name or any other alias
odds are the content would be the same
what i suspect is on offer by trolls >> is a desire to have this board shut down
so that content re: JBI comes from the vehicle of choice re: OTC stock manipulation
i've never said they were >> note the inference that they are a *bad* person is yours
i've always been clear that each investor is responsible for his/her own DD
since it's their money invested
and here is another difference between us PP .. i don't care if an
alias is genuine or not or gung ho .. or not .. i understand an exhausted
*retail* and sincerely look forward to them being able to exit
their investment in JBI at a gain
what i do see on offer via this post >> is the desire for investors to sell
(still holding)
why any investors' holding of JBII is your business .. escapes me
it's a newly emerging disruptive tech in its ascension
there are no hard and fast rules ..
i'm sorry this continues to elude
risk rises exponentially the closer mgmt gets to execution
zero doubts 2 of the 3 entities actively working against JBI's transition
from the OTC over the past few years >> keep on working until
forced to change their ways
again since it eludes .. i know the risk .. i'm sorry my lack of emotions
re: investors' paper losses disturb *some*
i'm very clear that folks learn about the OTC and in particular that site
whose founder currently sits in a federal penitentiary
but if you choose not to do so .. that is your call PP
as i've noted to you a few times previously .. highly doubtful anyone's mind set will be changed via posts
what i look for is *awareness* ratcheting up as certain realities come to bear
like calling for *volume* of X or >> reg sho percentages of Y
or noting how RBC's non allowance of a buy re: JBII stock
may actually be bonus in disguise
the constant refrain of 2009's input by the company founder is imo
irrelevant in 2014 .. due to co.s intent to sell prox
they don't have to be *profitable* >> just desired and salable
with an ability to process *purchasers* feed stock
that is it in a nutshell
if 3 works >> and 4 and 5 (or both) are sold
it's game over
now if co. is so weakened after 5 years of unrelenting efforts
and there is no asset sale on tap after housekeeping items are
dealt with
then it may well be game over for investors .. that is *risk* tolerance PP
again this isn't rocket science and there is no investor i interact with
that doesn't recognize this reality
i think we are done for this round
4kids
it's always been that way PP
i don't control *deletions* in total
but gee another drive by insult re: rogue moderator
how very non surprising
in order ..
Quote:
What was your problem with my post??
the fact that you are unaware just how different this site is from lie hub
re: deletions
and the presumption that i wouldn't delete an investor's PA
whether you realize it or not >> i've done that more than a few times b4
Quote:
Whether you have the power to delete posts or not, you should clean up your act. Calling people trolls doesn't help anyone but I'm glad your posts stand since people can see your colors better. Your passive-aggressive manner doesn't make the board any more conducive to good conversation either. Stop trying to pick a fight.
i have zero respect for those who post on SMBs and don't carry their
alias over
it's deceitful
and again it's JMO >> and no you don't have to agree with it
but yep >> i do believe *trolls* litter various SMBs >> something
i've noted for years
re: cleaning up my act .. my act is clearly articulated re: beliefs
and it's why i've documented trading data (facts) on JBII for years
the last thing anyone would call me is passive/aggressive PP
see above
Quote:
These boards can be great forums for discussing the prospects of a company. It would be great for everyone if that was how people used it. I don't like but understand that some people will cheer mindlessly for a stock they own and alternatively some people will mindlessly bash a stock they don't like. They come with the territory. However your name is at the top of the board so you have some pull for setting a precedent...but you're trying to start a fray rather than set an example.
no one is stopping the discussion .. and the *fray* wasn't started by me
i'd suggest you go back and read this board from the beginning
it's only when lie hub did their latest that aspects *changed* here
as for my name being at the top of this board .. it wouldn't matter
if it was my name or any other alias
odds are the content would be the same
what i suspect is on offer by trolls >> is a desire to have this board shut down
so that content re: JBI comes from the vehicle of choice re: OTC stock manipulation
Quote:
Not everyone with a view contrary to yours is a bad person either. Likewise I know many longs who seem like genuine people. Techisbest, Saul and a few others seem genuine and not just because they're questioning JBI's prospects now. I've felt Techisbest was genuine and said as much even when he was gung ho for JBII...I think being honest with everyone including himself helped him to see the light even if he unfortunately is still holding.
i've never said they were >> note the inference that they are a *bad* person is yours
i've always been clear that each investor is responsible for his/her own DD
since it's their money invested
and here is another difference between us PP .. i don't care if an
alias is genuine or not or gung ho .. or not .. i understand an exhausted
*retail* and sincerely look forward to them being able to exit
their investment in JBI at a gain
what i do see on offer via this post >> is the desire for investors to sell
(still holding)
why any investors' holding of JBII is your business .. escapes me
Quote:
If you listen carefully, some of the skeptics might have some good points. Fighting them for the sake of fighting them won't help you nor anyone else.
it's a newly emerging disruptive tech in its ascension
there are no hard and fast rules ..
i'm sorry this continues to elude
risk rises exponentially the closer mgmt gets to execution
zero doubts 2 of the 3 entities actively working against JBI's transition
from the OTC over the past few years >> keep on working until
forced to change their ways
again since it eludes .. i know the risk .. i'm sorry my lack of emotions
re: investors' paper losses disturb *some*
i'm very clear that folks learn about the OTC and in particular that site
whose founder currently sits in a federal penitentiary
but if you choose not to do so .. that is your call PP
as i've noted to you a few times previously .. highly doubtful anyone's mind set will be changed via posts
what i look for is *awareness* ratcheting up as certain realities come to bear
like calling for *volume* of X or >> reg sho percentages of Y
or noting how RBC's non allowance of a buy re: JBII stock
may actually be bonus in disguise
the constant refrain of 2009's input by the company founder is imo
irrelevant in 2014 .. due to co.s intent to sell prox
they don't have to be *profitable* >> just desired and salable
with an ability to process *purchasers* feed stock
that is it in a nutshell
if 3 works >> and 4 and 5 (or both) are sold
it's game over
now if co. is so weakened after 5 years of unrelenting efforts
and there is no asset sale on tap after housekeeping items are
dealt with
then it may well be game over for investors .. that is *risk* tolerance PP
again this isn't rocket science and there is no investor i interact with
that doesn't recognize this reality
i think we are done for this round
4kids
(0)
(0)Plastic2Oil, Inc. (PTOI) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼