i have a few basic caveats besides *they all collu

i have a few basic caveats besides *they all collude* (Banksters/Brokesters)

and they never cover one second b4 being forced to do so

and that is

NO ONE >> posts on a SMB without having a financial incentive

retail investors clearly have financial incentives

traders have financial incentives

shorts have financial incentives

those who manipulate (orchestrate) poorly watched OTC stox have
financial incentives

those who wish to acquire disruptive techs in newly emerging sectors
for pennies on the $ >> have financial incentives

one of the reasons i advocated for a trial >> was the discovery that would precede said trial

clearly even the most *unaware* can see a chart and notice the *decline*
of the stock from mid 2012 >> with one exception (Jan 2013)

this has to be separated out from *original* entity that *orchestrated*
JBII/TRTN from the second TRTN was first publicly traded in 2009

this has to be separated out from a known *short* who entered JBII
in 2011

this has to be separated out from the *crew* (both sides well represented)
that works OTC stox (UP/DOWN) via the vehicle of choice re: OTC
stock manipulation

which lastly has to be separated out from those who have CONnections
that aid and abet on an as needed basis (and yep that includes ties
to the dolts)

very little is as it seems imo but it's all interwoven to some degree

but what matters is what mgmt does re: ability to execute (transition
from OTC)

and that is the current *risk* in place

zero doubts PROs utilze the Q to *orchestrate* JBII >> DOWN upon filing

unless of course there is a material event (subsequent event) duly noted

that will force them to take JBII higher

and will clearly show *reg sho* %s marked above 50%

this is why this data had to be monkey'd with .. by those who manipulate to show that *pattern* of almost zero *reg sho*

as noted by restalker on lie hub these last few months

notice that *absence* >> recently

it's clearly also why i came to the PROs' attn back in 2009 or so

it's not so easy to dismiss someone who spent most of Feb 2010
on the phone interacting with both the dolts and Finra

it's also not so easy to slime someone who has never taken stock
to PROMOTE .. something the *crew* working the vehicle of choice
re: OTC stock manipulation (CON side) has to always insinuate

and since >> er >> another has just been *nailed* .. and the noose continues
to tighten >> it's not my shoulder being looked over

it may take another few rounds re: nailing for the obvious to become *known* to *most*

but it will become *known* in due course >> zero doubts

let's see if reg sho %s continue upwards this coming week

if so >> without a doubt .. the ironies re: RBC are indeed both amusing
and revealing

and yep .. i do get that most retail won't understand the above post

but trust me >> those who manipulate/orchestrate and LIE with impunity

most definitely do

4kids