that 'other board' was always a cesspool. 'investo
Post# of 96892
Posted On: 06/06/2014 9:48:28 AM
Re: rustydog62 #4368
that 'other board' was always a cesspool. 'investors' contribute to it more than they realize. replying to every stupid thing, keeps stupid things on the menu.
no investor want to see chaos, fighting, back-and-forth. and that never benefits investors. so many good things going on with ntek. so much to learn about the company. instead of maintaining focus on those things, helping new visitors understand what nteks business is, what they do, what the market research shows - human beings seem to choose garbage-talking, negativity, and fighting.
longs often outnumber bashers. but longs keep giving bashers the spotlight with which to beat them. longs keep engaging and replying to them. people, getting twisted by opinions, getting caught in the bashers web. and clueless that it is happening to them.
they get banned. then come over to inv hangout. eventually start doing the same crap they probably did over there. bitch. moan. complain. with negative prognostications (often with terribly inaccurate info drawing false conclusions)
meanwhile a good, solid, growing company that could benefit from legitimate attention has their 'own longs' participating in discouraging investment by unwisely soliciting and engaging in garbage-talk.
what's worse? most don't even know the dd, fail to comprehend with accuracy what's going on,... but have hours of negative commentary about how terrible the company is, how they should, or better, do this or that...if longs could hear themselves.
maybe they'd see how 10-15 bashers controlling a board of 100. silly. sad. but that seems to be the reality i have witnessed all too often. too bad you can't tell anyone this in a way that puts some sense into them.
ntek is very likely to prevail. too many significant hirings, quality staff, intelligent additions, people with pedigree, who have experience in the industry, who left solid companies, business leaders, who have bought into nanotech's vision. too many significant successes in just the past 6 months, since ces, to ignore, too many big-name partners, consistent progress across many formats (prod, software, add-ons, interface, et. al.) to ignore any longer.
the dd is there. and there is nothing that says the company won't be given every opportunity to be successful. all they need is a very tiny slim piece of the pie to be wildly successful (for shareholders). that is
how it is. like it or not. that's the reality of ntek
no investor want to see chaos, fighting, back-and-forth. and that never benefits investors. so many good things going on with ntek. so much to learn about the company. instead of maintaining focus on those things, helping new visitors understand what nteks business is, what they do, what the market research shows - human beings seem to choose garbage-talking, negativity, and fighting.
longs often outnumber bashers. but longs keep giving bashers the spotlight with which to beat them. longs keep engaging and replying to them. people, getting twisted by opinions, getting caught in the bashers web. and clueless that it is happening to them.
they get banned. then come over to inv hangout. eventually start doing the same crap they probably did over there. bitch. moan. complain. with negative prognostications (often with terribly inaccurate info drawing false conclusions)
meanwhile a good, solid, growing company that could benefit from legitimate attention has their 'own longs' participating in discouraging investment by unwisely soliciting and engaging in garbage-talk.
what's worse? most don't even know the dd, fail to comprehend with accuracy what's going on,... but have hours of negative commentary about how terrible the company is, how they should, or better, do this or that...if longs could hear themselves.
maybe they'd see how 10-15 bashers controlling a board of 100. silly. sad. but that seems to be the reality i have witnessed all too often. too bad you can't tell anyone this in a way that puts some sense into them.
ntek is very likely to prevail. too many significant hirings, quality staff, intelligent additions, people with pedigree, who have experience in the industry, who left solid companies, business leaders, who have bought into nanotech's vision. too many significant successes in just the past 6 months, since ces, to ignore, too many big-name partners, consistent progress across many formats (prod, software, add-ons, interface, et. al.) to ignore any longer.
the dd is there. and there is nothing that says the company won't be given every opportunity to be successful. all they need is a very tiny slim piece of the pie to be wildly successful (for shareholders). that is
how it is. like it or not. that's the reality of ntek
(0)
(0)