This may sting them a bit: You said: "Treat

This may sting them a bit:

You said:

"Treaty needs to prove the petitioners damaged Treaty."


Absolutely agree and the treasure trove of correspondence from the petitioners to parties such as State Agencies, contractors, land owners, service providers (and the list goes on), interfering with ongoing business opportunites for Treaty...will be overwhelming evidence, leaving the Judge with little other option but to level a devastating judgement against the petitioners. Through the cooperation of the categories of parties contacted by the petitioners, Treaty and it legal counsel now have in their possession enough evidence to bury the petitioners at trial.

It is important to note, this phase of the trial isn't about guilt or innocence, that has already been decided earlier when 90% of the petitioners failed to show to back up their False BK claim. Therefore, the Judge easily ruled that the petitioners had no valid grounds for the lawsuit. So, this phase of the trial is to assign damages, based on the aforementioned evidence that Treaty, no doubt has in its possession.

A great day is coming....and the petitioners should be trembling.