Well, keep in mind that SAIC was working in the re

Well, keep in mind that SAIC was working in the realm of using JBI's assumptions in order to come up with an assessment. What those assumptions made by JBI were, was never disclosed...only that JBI's press release said that the assumptions may be incorrect or outdated and that they shouldn't be relied upon. However since it was done, disingenuous types will sing about them regardless whether or not JBI said they shouldn't be relied upon.

Anyone who sings about the SAIC assessment with the undisclosed assumptions fed to them from JBI hasn't thought this through or is being disingenuous. Also remember that there were supposedly three years of real data available from running the processor so why would JBI need SAIC and hypothetical data rather than real data from the processor??

The reason is that SAIC's name gives credibility...even if SAIC was hired to work with incorrect assumptions. I have no doubt SAIC's work was sound...but JBI's incorrect assumptions which SAIC was hired to use in their report makes the results worthless.

Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.