I believe the CEO could easily mitigate investor c
Post# of 56324
Posted On: 04/15/2014 9:37:09 PM
I believe the CEO could easily mitigate investor concerns by addressing SS as follows.
1. What is the total cash (hard dollar) capital investments into the company that Capital Shield, Prime Equities, Swan Alliance, HH Group, LLC, JW Financial, Richardson and others make in return for 1.4+ Billion shares issued at .001 The actual capital expenditure to date can not be anywhere close to the value of the shares issued? IMO.
2. What schedule, if any exists, is there for these shares to enter the market? Is there a pps trigger for these shares to sell into the market?
3. Are any/all of the insider shareholders identified above all arms length transactions?
Why is this important? Glad you asked
The quantity of shares able to be sold into the market (do the math here) would (if sold) be a huge dilution potentially leaving investors holding stock worth ? If you take 1.4 billion shares X .05 averaged pps , you get the picture here., (that's a lot of new and existing investor capital to offset 1.4 billion shares).
2. Larger investors generally will stay away from SS that is structured to allow insiders a means to pull huge amounts of capital from the market especially when the company is a startup or early stage company. If SS was timed to offset against revenues this would not be nearly as important.
There could be a simple explanation here that has to do with 49% control but I will leave that for someone else.
To the Mods (Not Weedman)
This is an honest discussion that as a shareholder is important towards my invested capital and everyone else that has money at risk. These questions are not deceptive and do not in any way disparage the very fine job done so far and I fully expect the construction will soon be completed and license issued. But the SS as an issue still must be addressed. It will come out one way or the other soon enough but we as shareholders have a right to an explanation and I believe the company has an obligation towards the interest of its shareholders to address these issues.
As always, I appreciate all comments. Please use logic not emotion when responding.
Thank you
Mike
1. What is the total cash (hard dollar) capital investments into the company that Capital Shield, Prime Equities, Swan Alliance, HH Group, LLC, JW Financial, Richardson and others make in return for 1.4+ Billion shares issued at .001 The actual capital expenditure to date can not be anywhere close to the value of the shares issued? IMO.
2. What schedule, if any exists, is there for these shares to enter the market? Is there a pps trigger for these shares to sell into the market?
3. Are any/all of the insider shareholders identified above all arms length transactions?
Why is this important? Glad you asked
The quantity of shares able to be sold into the market (do the math here) would (if sold) be a huge dilution potentially leaving investors holding stock worth ? If you take 1.4 billion shares X .05 averaged pps , you get the picture here., (that's a lot of new and existing investor capital to offset 1.4 billion shares).
2. Larger investors generally will stay away from SS that is structured to allow insiders a means to pull huge amounts of capital from the market especially when the company is a startup or early stage company. If SS was timed to offset against revenues this would not be nearly as important.
There could be a simple explanation here that has to do with 49% control but I will leave that for someone else.
To the Mods (Not Weedman)
This is an honest discussion that as a shareholder is important towards my invested capital and everyone else that has money at risk. These questions are not deceptive and do not in any way disparage the very fine job done so far and I fully expect the construction will soon be completed and license issued. But the SS as an issue still must be addressed. It will come out one way or the other soon enough but we as shareholders have a right to an explanation and I believe the company has an obligation towards the interest of its shareholders to address these issues.
As always, I appreciate all comments. Please use logic not emotion when responding.
Thank you
Mike
(0)
(0)