Skorogi, you put in a lot of your opinions there..

Skorogi, you put in a lot of your opinions there...let me cut to the one(s) which supposedly show that the process has value.

" False, SAI never relies on assumption they are "fed." Its part of the definition of "independent third party testing." "

If you look at the press release, JBI even says SAIC relied on assumptions. And in SAIC's report, SAIC says that the assumptions are available from JBI. SAIC would do what they're hired to do. Your "independend third party testing" theory doesn't apply.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/jbi-comments-im...00984.html

If you think about this further, JBI had three years of real operating data. They could have, and should have, told investors how well the processors were running based on that real data. Why do you think Mr. Bordynuik needed SAIC to evaluate the process based on hypothetical assumptions they were given??

Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.