Here's the SEC's complaint: https://www.sec.gov/li
Post# of 43064
We can argue all day whether Mr. Bordynuik was dishonest or, as you assert, he was just a naive, gullible person who wasn't smart enough to figure out that booking assets in the 10-K at an inflated value was wrong.
In the end hopefully you'll agree that what counts is whether Mr. Bordynuik is being honest about how well his process works.
Can you see that the most important factor of JBI's future success is whether or not what goes into the processors can be transformed into something more valuable coming out?
Can you see how processors #2 and #3 not running might signal a major problem with Mr. Bordynuik's thesis of commercial viability of the catalyst?