Keeks, would agree if the cost of borrowing was de

Keeks, would agree if the cost of borrowing was defined and contained...I don't want nothing to do with any shares tied up (or generated from ) loan contingencies.

Agree that if funds could be had at reasonable cost, it would be a better deal to fund the buyback than having to buy back shares at 2,3 4 x stock prices.....

I just don't know how realistic it is to raise funding for a buyback till they have proven deliveries, money received, and future orders. That's why I think it could be a possibility they raised some the way the had to and will deal with share prices on a buy back the way they have to....More power to them if they can get financing arranged on reasonable terms!!

I don't want to harp on that....by my calculations, using the 20 bill OSs, and very reasonable prices for tree sales with one 120, we have an extremely strong upside at a very low PE for a strong growth startup.

I feel good making that statement, so lower OS, higher prices for trees, or more interest from public/institutional investors make it intreging to me.

That's why I am still here and will be for awhile.