tech: "*** 54. Bordynuik used the Childrens’ Tr
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 04/08/2014 11:22:16 AM
Re: techisbest #6812
tech:
"***
54. Bordynuik used the Childrens’ Trust account at DS as a reservoir of JBI shares which he then distributed to people who had provided services to or had been involved in or friendly to the company’s operations .
***"
http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Proceed...uikjw.pdff
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WOW
The fact that so many of the posters who are clearly "friendly to the company's operations" are publicly scorning any idea of demanding from "Honest John" (ha ha ha ha) that he identify these parties ...... well, that speaks volumes, as they say.
Why wouldn't "longs" want to know this incredibly maddening and important information? (important primarily in identifying JBII as a scam). Didn't "Honest John" (coffee through my nose again .. sorry) and all the posters "friendly to the company's operations" tell us thousands of times that John never paid any "promoters" of the stock?? IMO: This is now an irrefutable, proven lie, just as the oft-repeated lie that "Honest John" (groan) never sold any stock?? And we have to find ALL THIS VITAL INFORMATION, not from the public filings of this "transparent" and "honest" company, but from public documents from government agencies that reveal, years after the fact, that these were lies from "Honest John"?? (and remember: REVEALED UNDER OATH).
What does that say??
** Sextuple snort ***
"Honest John" ..... noun. Synonym for "oxymoron". See oxymoron
"***
54. Bordynuik used the Childrens’ Trust account at DS as a reservoir of JBI shares which he then distributed to people who had provided services to or had been involved in or friendly to the company’s operations .
***"
http://www.osc.gov.on.ca/documents/en/Proceed...uikjw.pdff
-----------------------------------------------------------------
WOW
The fact that so many of the posters who are clearly "friendly to the company's operations" are publicly scorning any idea of demanding from "Honest John" (ha ha ha ha) that he identify these parties ...... well, that speaks volumes, as they say.
Why wouldn't "longs" want to know this incredibly maddening and important information? (important primarily in identifying JBII as a scam). Didn't "Honest John" (coffee through my nose again .. sorry) and all the posters "friendly to the company's operations" tell us thousands of times that John never paid any "promoters" of the stock?? IMO: This is now an irrefutable, proven lie, just as the oft-repeated lie that "Honest John" (groan) never sold any stock?? And we have to find ALL THIS VITAL INFORMATION, not from the public filings of this "transparent" and "honest" company, but from public documents from government agencies that reveal, years after the fact, that these were lies from "Honest John"?? (and remember: REVEALED UNDER OATH).
What does that say??
** Sextuple snort ***
"Honest John" ..... noun. Synonym for "oxymoron". See oxymoron
(0)
(0)