This is how ICPA B*shers work: They will do thei

This is how ICPA B*shers work: They will do their best to remain anonymous or use a fake identity. They will use about 10% fact and 90% suggestion. The carefully chosen and carefully placed facts are there to lend credibility to the rest of what they say, which is merely unfounded suggestion intended to deceive. To start with, they wait for others to help you learn about whatever stock interests you. Then they develop rapport and build a support base before initiating their bashing routine. They will enter the discussion with humor and will reply to everyone else who replies to their target's postings. A single b*sher often will use two or more aliases to make it appear that a discussion has begun. He or she will post from multiple ISP's and use multiple "handles." The b*sher usually does not start with an all-out slam of the stock. He or she will build up to the bashing over a period of time. B*shers will identify their foe, usually the board's "guru." Then the clever ba*hers will use them to their own advantage and lead them, but they will not follow the "guru's" lead. B*shers only bash until the tide and momentum turns, then they simply let doubt carry their message the rest of the way. B*shers try to give the appearance of being open-minded. B*shers are bold in their statements, knowing that people like to follow strength. B*shers like to write headlines in capital letters and use catchy phrases. B*shers will "pour it on" as their position gains momentum. B*shers don't worry about being labeled a "b*sher," since the current newbie being targeted won't know the b*sher's history. When identified, a b*sher will put up a brief fight, then back off and return in an hour or so. But if a basher's foe is a weak in reasoning powers, the b*sher will just come on even stronger and push ahead with the b*shing. If a b*sher is discredited, he or she will change aliases, maybe change the gender of the alias, and continue on that board or another one. A b*sher's goal is to limit the momentum of the run, but not to tank the company or create a plunge in the stock; thus a b*sher will tend to be subtle and consistent. The b*sher is out to kill the dreams of profits, but not the company or the stock itself. B*shers use questions to create critical thinking, but they guide the critical thinking toward their own intended conclusion. What is posted ends up not actually being critical thinking on the part of the investor; it just looks like it is. The investor feels informed but, in reality, the b*sher has guided the thinking. B*shers try to look nice. They don't lie, use profanity, or resort to name-calling. B*shers encourage people to call the company, knowing that 99% of them won't ever do so. Instead, all but the most savvy investors will take the b*sher's word for claims made. If an investor does call, a smart b*sher can always find something that is inaccurate in the report of what the company said. B*shers also discourage people from taking the company's word for anything, saying, "Of course that is what the company is going to claim." If the company's history or its PR is negative, a b*sher will continually return to that point. The b*sher will compile a list of anything negative about the company that is true before beginning to b*sh it. If the price of the company's stock rises, the b*sher will attribute that to the hype or the PR, claim it's only a temporary mass reaction, say "it's just the market," or give any reason other than the actual merits of the ICPA stock itself. If other posters share a b*sher's "concerns", the b*sher will play on his or her good luck and share even more "concerns." B*shers always cite low volume, even when it's not true. A b*sher who is writing from three or four aliases can dominate a board and wear down the rest of the posters. B*shers will bait the hypesters into personality debates, diverting their focus and efforts from the stocks to the posters. B*shers will say they are trying to present the facts from a "different perspective." B*shers will try to promote other stocks that would-be investors can investigate instead of the one they are bashing. B*shers refuse to respond to any challenges on the "values" or ethics of what they are doing. For them, it's a game, and they are playing it by their own rules. http:// www.m*nam*rgroup.com/stock_bashers.php put link together! Real proof and wonned by the party, real proven court fact! That is the reason longs are holding and buying ICPA stock! The float could already be locked up and the market makers use accounting gimmicks to cover but can not do it into the new year of 2013! Got feeling that the some are working for mm! They will haft to cover by end of year! I seen another stock go high in nov. and dec. cause they had to cover! Then it dropped off in jan. but then took off in feb and march to new highs!  My posts got deleted by em, LoL! Now tweeted!  Go ICPA!