Yes, $750 exchanged hands today. Don't we have
Post# of 39368
12/31/2013, 200 BPD from the Mitchells and possibly CFP, etc has been just as damaging to many shareholders and all that "false advertising" has nothing to do with BK petitioners.
One could argue the damage caused to shareholders and their families by pure incompetence and/or exaggerated public relations going back years far outways the recent damage caused by petitioners. Keep in mind these PR's are dictated from the top down. It has nothing to do with the present or past PR messengers! Maybe TECO couldn't procure funding due to the damage caused by petitioners or similar but I question: Why wasn't the revenue in place to begin with? Why wasn't the funding in place to begin with? How can a six month plan be publically announced without "funding" in place to begin with? I have a hard time believing it is all the petitioners actions that caused a steady decline in PPS from an intraday high of .13 down to today's .003 +/- over a period of years. Stop blaming BK petitioners for obvious business failure and incompetence at the expense of shareholders. I know some here who have lost from 10's to 100's of thousands of dollars. I am one of them! I hope there is someone out there trying to set things right and finally looking out for the best interest of shareholders.