Hey Miller,
In reply to your post, I see a lot of people on this board posting a lot of positive things daily without any position in detail, and following up with 4 or 5 posts of the same thing with no explanation of their position or evidence to justify. From what I read, if you are on the other spectrum (maybe a naysayer), the board does not tolerate this.
If you are a naysayer, is posting links to published newspaper articles enough backup to explain a position and maybe some of the things that could affect the stock that investors should be aware of? Is this a board where people can freely post up-to-date news although it may be something negative? How much research, backup, and data has to go into a post that may lead people consider an investment from all angles, both positive and negative?
In reply to your post, I see a lot of people on this board posting a lot of positive things daily without any position in detail, and following up with 4 or 5 posts of the same thing with no explanation of their position or evidence to justify. From what I read, if you are on the other spectrum (maybe a naysayer), the board does not tolerate this.
If you are a naysayer, is posting links to published newspaper articles enough backup to explain a position and maybe some of the things that could affect the stock that investors should be aware of? Is this a board where people can freely post up-to-date news although it may be something negative? How much research, backup, and data has to go into a post that may lead people consider an investment from all angles, both positive and negative?
