Question for 4kids. You say: "keep the eye on the
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 03/19/2014 2:36:37 PM
Question for 4kids. You say:
"keep the eye on the prize .. the aspect re: Madison county that actually mattered
was the *current* price tag (range) associated with one proc
"
So you are referring to the 8-9 Million price tag for Unit 3 prospective sales.
In your post you also say that everything to-date is garbage. Fuel production is garbage. The fact that they made a measly 15k last quarter is garbage.
8 or 9 Million is a fantastic figure. It would take 600 quarters or 150 years for a customer to recoup their investment. Do the math and correct me if I am wrong. 150 YEARS. That is without Cost of Capital.
This is not directly released by JBI. It comes from meeting minutes from another company, and supposedly is JBI's selling price. Hence, JBI is conveniently unaccountable for that information. Similar to the SAIC Summary, which I have driven a truck through on this forum. How convenient..
Yet that is the basis for shareholders to continue hoping JBI will be successful?
"keep the eye on the prize .. the aspect re: Madison county that actually mattered
was the *current* price tag (range) associated with one proc
"
So you are referring to the 8-9 Million price tag for Unit 3 prospective sales.
In your post you also say that everything to-date is garbage. Fuel production is garbage. The fact that they made a measly 15k last quarter is garbage.
8 or 9 Million is a fantastic figure. It would take 600 quarters or 150 years for a customer to recoup their investment. Do the math and correct me if I am wrong. 150 YEARS. That is without Cost of Capital.
This is not directly released by JBI. It comes from meeting minutes from another company, and supposedly is JBI's selling price. Hence, JBI is conveniently unaccountable for that information. Similar to the SAIC Summary, which I have driven a truck through on this forum. How convenient..
Yet that is the basis for shareholders to continue hoping JBI will be successful?
(0)
(0)