re-posted that because another board was discussin
Post# of 8059
Posted On: 02/09/2014 12:06:29 PM
Re: mediscience #6031
re-posted that because another board was discussing elements of that- also had posted a lot more back then in contravention of the idea CWRN shares would be worthless(as a result of the dividend) and reposted also to show how penny traders seem to assume the worst-(before latest dtc games) posters assumed the dividend was a r/s
dont know what holdup is, but 1st rule is to go back to the extant conditions of that time frame -which people almost never do-the main 1 being it looked like the tx case might be over before the stated time frame -before such case was delayed many times
since geo tried to involve brad,once tx case was delayed,that may have caused brad to delay some things/reporting,not because of any wrongdoing but so as not to aid geos fishing expedition
cwrn cant file financials for duration of jva until court decides what those are,but could file financials since jva ended Aug 2011, unless brad feels 1 impacts the other -but wont know cumulative retained earnings figure in any case until court decides, so have to deal w that in a note to financials
all we know is brad was dealing w and solving transitional issues,presumably expected and unexpected,but as time goes on the need to report in fulfillment of the duty to inform stockholders becomes greater
last reported visit near the mine-see tenn21 post- showed more workers than under bob-and I post about ensenada and weather there partially to encourage those who might live nearby or vacation to drop by and give us a look see,because there is only so much i can do from the jungles of Papua New Guinea
there is plenty of inventory to ship, so is port playing games again?-last time cwrn had to win a suit against the port to ship -just 1 possibility
we know navials ambitious plans from their website pdf- 1 doesnt acquire an impressive 1.2 million acre concession empire for nothing-and such plans did not seem to be predicated
on navial jv'ing or selling out to a big steelmaker -so the mystery continues
dont know what holdup is, but 1st rule is to go back to the extant conditions of that time frame -which people almost never do-the main 1 being it looked like the tx case might be over before the stated time frame -before such case was delayed many times
since geo tried to involve brad,once tx case was delayed,that may have caused brad to delay some things/reporting,not because of any wrongdoing but so as not to aid geos fishing expedition
cwrn cant file financials for duration of jva until court decides what those are,but could file financials since jva ended Aug 2011, unless brad feels 1 impacts the other -but wont know cumulative retained earnings figure in any case until court decides, so have to deal w that in a note to financials
all we know is brad was dealing w and solving transitional issues,presumably expected and unexpected,but as time goes on the need to report in fulfillment of the duty to inform stockholders becomes greater
last reported visit near the mine-see tenn21 post- showed more workers than under bob-and I post about ensenada and weather there partially to encourage those who might live nearby or vacation to drop by and give us a look see,because there is only so much i can do from the jungles of Papua New Guinea
there is plenty of inventory to ship, so is port playing games again?-last time cwrn had to win a suit against the port to ship -just 1 possibility
we know navials ambitious plans from their website pdf- 1 doesnt acquire an impressive 1.2 million acre concession empire for nothing-and such plans did not seem to be predicated
on navial jv'ing or selling out to a big steelmaker -so the mystery continues
(0)
(0)