|
|
|
This is a great post from one of the Longs. I just had to post it over here!!!!!!!
So say what you want about this company. Dislike the speed or tweets of the CEO. Disregard what has succeeded to focus on the delays. Doubt what cannot be proven, either right or wrong yet. And throw mud on what has appeared to be an honest, hardworking man.
None of that will change the future of where this company is going. I believe if I were to pull up the statistics on the first and second years of MANY successful companies, it would be shocking to see what they went through to get to where they are.
But I don't mind a CEO that shoots extremely high, to hit a mark slightly below---it's still quite high. And that's where we are. People doubt the CEO for the lack of hitting the extremely high target he set. drugstore.com was criticized for not being out early as he thought, yet actually is within the 6-9 month range which is very typical for a major website to obtain and place product live. And an incredible success for this company. The same with many other facets as well. And there will be more to come.
We already have the updated information on the shelving of products, and have seen that even due to a delay, Nick actually turned that into a success as well, but one that will have to be waited for. And the only way we will know is just that...to wait and see.
If I couldn't wait? I'd sell and go.
Because no definitive proof has been offered to show MedGen is involved in any scam, and actually, quite the opposite. Those arguments get dispelled again and again, yet always seem to show back up again like they are valid somehow. But they're not.
Being that this is a restart, I can be patient. I have diligence that in some parts, does take a bit of faith. Some is proof. And some is just the most likely scenario. But the arguments are actually usually the most UNlikely scenarios. Just fit into a scam argument.
For example, we are waiting on Walgreens.com. But since it's not live, we are told it's a lie. That means, in the same PR, and in dealing with the exact same company, Nick told the truth about drugstore.com, yet lied about Walgreens.com. Or, better yet, he lied about both, yet must have worked really really hard to cut a deal with drugstore.com to get the product up, which would still be impressive if in the timeframe from the original PR. It's just silly. And getting sillier.
And again, we just got told Nick is being sued, but that turned into 'Nick is setting himself UP to be sued' (even though, he has all of the info and contracts and the statement is based on having none of that LOL). That's quite a different argument, but it shifted as it needed to, to try to make Nick some sociopath. And keep in mind, for all of this to be true, for Nick to be a criminal while cutting deals with Walgreens, reducing the A/S, keeping Amazon and QCI constantly stocked, and actually putting out MORE products, while keeping straight certain lies and keeping them in line with exactly what happens within the industry, that's exactly what he would have to be.
The actually and most likely truth? Nick is a hard-working American businessman, and really good at what he does. He's had bumps, as he will, but has kept going, and tried to do his best to share and keep his shareholders informed, even when he probably should not have early on. And we are just starting to see the fruits of his hard work. WE are the ones who sit and criticize, not the ones burning the candle at both ends.
I'm not going to jump and call a man I don't know whose business I can't see in its entirety a criminal just because I put in a few bucks. That was my choice.
And I have more integrity than that.
GO MDIN GO!!!!!
So say what you want about this company. Dislike the speed or tweets of the CEO. Disregard what has succeeded to focus on the delays. Doubt what cannot be proven, either right or wrong yet. And throw mud on what has appeared to be an honest, hardworking man.
None of that will change the future of where this company is going. I believe if I were to pull up the statistics on the first and second years of MANY successful companies, it would be shocking to see what they went through to get to where they are.
But I don't mind a CEO that shoots extremely high, to hit a mark slightly below---it's still quite high. And that's where we are. People doubt the CEO for the lack of hitting the extremely high target he set. drugstore.com was criticized for not being out early as he thought, yet actually is within the 6-9 month range which is very typical for a major website to obtain and place product live. And an incredible success for this company. The same with many other facets as well. And there will be more to come.
We already have the updated information on the shelving of products, and have seen that even due to a delay, Nick actually turned that into a success as well, but one that will have to be waited for. And the only way we will know is just that...to wait and see.
If I couldn't wait? I'd sell and go.
Because no definitive proof has been offered to show MedGen is involved in any scam, and actually, quite the opposite. Those arguments get dispelled again and again, yet always seem to show back up again like they are valid somehow. But they're not.
Being that this is a restart, I can be patient. I have diligence that in some parts, does take a bit of faith. Some is proof. And some is just the most likely scenario. But the arguments are actually usually the most UNlikely scenarios. Just fit into a scam argument.
For example, we are waiting on Walgreens.com. But since it's not live, we are told it's a lie. That means, in the same PR, and in dealing with the exact same company, Nick told the truth about drugstore.com, yet lied about Walgreens.com. Or, better yet, he lied about both, yet must have worked really really hard to cut a deal with drugstore.com to get the product up, which would still be impressive if in the timeframe from the original PR. It's just silly. And getting sillier.
And again, we just got told Nick is being sued, but that turned into 'Nick is setting himself UP to be sued' (even though, he has all of the info and contracts and the statement is based on having none of that LOL). That's quite a different argument, but it shifted as it needed to, to try to make Nick some sociopath. And keep in mind, for all of this to be true, for Nick to be a criminal while cutting deals with Walgreens, reducing the A/S, keeping Amazon and QCI constantly stocked, and actually putting out MORE products, while keeping straight certain lies and keeping them in line with exactly what happens within the industry, that's exactly what he would have to be.
The actually and most likely truth? Nick is a hard-working American businessman, and really good at what he does. He's had bumps, as he will, but has kept going, and tried to do his best to share and keep his shareholders informed, even when he probably should not have early on. And we are just starting to see the fruits of his hard work. WE are the ones who sit and criticize, not the ones burning the candle at both ends.
I'm not going to jump and call a man I don't know whose business I can't see in its entirety a criminal just because I put in a few bucks. That was my choice.
And I have more integrity than that.
GO MDIN GO!!!!!
