Many people have the assumption a R/S is automati
Post# of 16816
Posted On: 02/05/2014 4:47:53 PM
Many people have the assumption a R/S is automatically bad. That's the case when the CEO does a R/S on the O/S but leaves A/S unchanged (gives room for large-scale dilution since A/S is no longer maxed).
Where an R/S is proportionate (say 10:1 O/S and 10:1 A/S to use your example) then it's neutral, or positive because it draws in investors who won't trade the super-sub-penny, sub-penny or even penny range. Market cap is the same and the ability to dilute hasn't changed since A/S is still maxed out (as it is in BCAP's case).
BCAP would look like this with a 10:1 R/S: one would see beforehand a 2.36B O/S and 2.4B A/S and $0.01 share price; and post R/S a 236M O/S and 240M A/S with a share price of $0.10. Both before and after a R/S BCAP's market cap would be $23.6M still with no room for dilution.
Caveat is:
1. No-one knows if buybacks have occured.
2. Talk of a R/S is purely hypothetical at this point in time because only Matt Dwyer knows the current share structure and any changes.
Where an R/S is proportionate (say 10:1 O/S and 10:1 A/S to use your example) then it's neutral, or positive because it draws in investors who won't trade the super-sub-penny, sub-penny or even penny range. Market cap is the same and the ability to dilute hasn't changed since A/S is still maxed out (as it is in BCAP's case).
BCAP would look like this with a 10:1 R/S: one would see beforehand a 2.36B O/S and 2.4B A/S and $0.01 share price; and post R/S a 236M O/S and 240M A/S with a share price of $0.10. Both before and after a R/S BCAP's market cap would be $23.6M still with no room for dilution.
Caveat is:
1. No-one knows if buybacks have occured.
2. Talk of a R/S is purely hypothetical at this point in time because only Matt Dwyer knows the current share structure and any changes.
(0)
(0)Baron Capital Enterprise, INC. (BCAP) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼