Built-in conflict of interest: MMs vs. investing p
Post# of 36729
Posted On: 02/05/2014 4:40:22 PM
Built-in conflict of interest: MMs vs. investing public. MMs play first violin. They come first. Public plays second fiddle; sacrificed or scalped as needed to cover losses and protect profits. This conflict is core problem, solved by automation, but powerful vested interests keep the software solution at bay. Wall Street MM firms showers both political parties with tons of money every year to maintain their archaic fiefdom.
MMs inherent conflict of interest brought into sharp focus when stock X goes up fast and far. MMs sell naked shares to meet demand. If uptrend continues, enormous problem to cover.
Wait for perceived peaking of pps in mini cycle and slackened trading. Get out hatchets and hack off scalps. Whack bids, strategic naked selling, trip stop losses, shake weaker hands, shake panicked hands, astonishing speed and raw power of operation triggers abject fear, panic, and falling sky. Herd stampeded out.
MMs COVER themselves with cheap shares. Protecting against loss, booking PROFIT.
It works every time. Uncontested power and control over the OTC market is the real reason-to-be for market makers.
MMs inherent conflict of interest brought into sharp focus when stock X goes up fast and far. MMs sell naked shares to meet demand. If uptrend continues, enormous problem to cover.
Wait for perceived peaking of pps in mini cycle and slackened trading. Get out hatchets and hack off scalps. Whack bids, strategic naked selling, trip stop losses, shake weaker hands, shake panicked hands, astonishing speed and raw power of operation triggers abject fear, panic, and falling sky. Herd stampeded out.
MMs COVER themselves with cheap shares. Protecting against loss, booking PROFIT.
It works every time. Uncontested power and control over the OTC market is the real reason-to-be for market makers.
(0)
(0)