btw,whenever I searched for Navial without adding
Post# of 8059
Posted On: 01/06/2014 2:56:09 AM
Re: mediscience #5880
btw,whenever I searched for Navial without adding mineria, I would get no hits.
Doubt there'd be anything for KMG which is not officially constituted last I looked-doubt they would've obtained any exploration license under KMG name yet when they haven't activated KMG w Nev SOS.
Mad or others posted a NI 43-101 for a Navial baja concession a long time ago done in 2010,which involved drilling ,logically a lot of it to obtain a NI 43-101 etc -I briefly read the long report (Navial HQ is Canada I believe).
So Navial should have an exploration license I would think- but not being a miner myself I dont know what the exact boundaries are for exploration licenses,which no doubt vary by jurisdiction and country.
So I dont know, except for the often incompleteness of Mexican records,something bashers knowingly prey upon.
One does not acquire a 1.2 million acre concession empire as Brad has done just to whistle Dixie,and we've seen Navial's website plans,well behind their stated timetable, as all co's seem to be.
Doubt there'd be anything for KMG which is not officially constituted last I looked-doubt they would've obtained any exploration license under KMG name yet when they haven't activated KMG w Nev SOS.
Mad or others posted a NI 43-101 for a Navial baja concession a long time ago done in 2010,which involved drilling ,logically a lot of it to obtain a NI 43-101 etc -I briefly read the long report (Navial HQ is Canada I believe).
So Navial should have an exploration license I would think- but not being a miner myself I dont know what the exact boundaries are for exploration licenses,which no doubt vary by jurisdiction and country.
So I dont know, except for the often incompleteness of Mexican records,something bashers knowingly prey upon.
One does not acquire a 1.2 million acre concession empire as Brad has done just to whistle Dixie,and we've seen Navial's website plans,well behind their stated timetable, as all co's seem to be.
(0)
(0)