Outlook of Private Placement Shares The post
Post# of 382
Posted On: 01/03/2014 4:50:26 PM
Outlook of Private Placement Shares
The post is republished after receiving requests to have it back online. If anyone finds anything wrong with it, please let me know.
http://jjsigmalabsblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/o...hares.html
Also, I've watched the .19 ceiling that held with the announcement of 2 PrintRite3D systems delivery and subsequent decline is PPS. I agree with some sentiment here that nothing has changed. I wrote elsewhere that I'm comfortable at any PPS. Sigma Labs will continue to progress regardless of PPS. What we know is that the aerospace industry is a $209 Billion market with growing backlogs aerospace manufacturers need to fill. We are only seeing the tip of the iceberg with the sale of 2 PrintRite3D systems. Also, GE plans on building a plant with 40+ 3D printers (can't recall exactly). And that is just GE alone. Other plans in place is the JTDA with Metronics, which I suspect will assist in meeting manufacturing standards as the Metronics 3D scanner is AS 1902 compliant. Sigma Labs does not create business relationships with ill-qualified companies or institutions. The Metronics laser scanner uses Boeing patented technology and Michigan Tech is a member of America Makes that is in agreement with ASTM F42 Committee to publish ISO/ASTM 52915:2013
http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/F4204.htm
Notice ISO/ASTM52915-13 in the page above which is:
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61944
There's something else that I'd like to point out. This is in regards to the day when PPS dropped to .13. The event happened to occur the same day the MOU with Michigan was announce. The drop in PPS and MOU announcement is not related. There been been prior MOU's and none has ever affected PPS. I wrote elsewhere:
Why such big volume today? To recover from an intraday drop 19.29% and close up 2.47%? For an MOU? The difference is the fundamentals. More investors are learning the legitimacy of SGLB. SGLB is not for the faint heart, but understanding the fundamentals and learning how SGLB differs from other 3D companies is key.
I hope everyone is well as we begin our New Year and I wish everyone prosperity in 2014.
The post is republished after receiving requests to have it back online. If anyone finds anything wrong with it, please let me know.
http://jjsigmalabsblog.blogspot.com/2013/12/o...hares.html
Also, I've watched the .19 ceiling that held with the announcement of 2 PrintRite3D systems delivery and subsequent decline is PPS. I agree with some sentiment here that nothing has changed. I wrote elsewhere that I'm comfortable at any PPS. Sigma Labs will continue to progress regardless of PPS. What we know is that the aerospace industry is a $209 Billion market with growing backlogs aerospace manufacturers need to fill. We are only seeing the tip of the iceberg with the sale of 2 PrintRite3D systems. Also, GE plans on building a plant with 40+ 3D printers (can't recall exactly). And that is just GE alone. Other plans in place is the JTDA with Metronics, which I suspect will assist in meeting manufacturing standards as the Metronics 3D scanner is AS 1902 compliant. Sigma Labs does not create business relationships with ill-qualified companies or institutions. The Metronics laser scanner uses Boeing patented technology and Michigan Tech is a member of America Makes that is in agreement with ASTM F42 Committee to publish ISO/ASTM 52915:2013
http://www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/F4204.htm
Notice ISO/ASTM52915-13 in the page above which is:
http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=61944
There's something else that I'd like to point out. This is in regards to the day when PPS dropped to .13. The event happened to occur the same day the MOU with Michigan was announce. The drop in PPS and MOU announcement is not related. There been been prior MOU's and none has ever affected PPS. I wrote elsewhere:
Why such big volume today? To recover from an intraday drop 19.29% and close up 2.47%? For an MOU? The difference is the fundamentals. More investors are learning the legitimacy of SGLB. SGLB is not for the faint heart, but understanding the fundamentals and learning how SGLB differs from other 3D companies is key.
I hope everyone is well as we begin our New Year and I wish everyone prosperity in 2014.
(0)
(0)