To beat somebody at their own game
Post# of 1609
Posted On: 12/19/2013 11:01:48 AM
Hi all,
as I do not have the licence to sail in the unknown waters, this is for all of us who are figthing the battle over there against unsubstantial bashing:
With no doubt one of the main recent topics seems to fuel fears of a *potential* restriction of tradeability of our company in any case.
So let´s consider that substantial facts can beat bashers with unsubstantial worries at their own game:
I know some posts over there were replied just by inverting the beginning of the sentences. In my opinion this is nothing more than kidding for better or for worse.
With substantial facts we should have the power to compete any rumor.
So keep in mind that the *possibility* of a restriction of tradeability should not be suitable to scare any investor investing in companies listed at the OTCBB. Furthermore in my opinion we are just talking about a possibility that is / should be part of the expectations of anyone of us.
Our argumentation should be quite the opposite: A restriction in the tradeability should limit the opportunities of investors / potential investors to enlarge their interest / to aquire an initial interest in our company. I call it the fear of getting no more share that shoul be positive for us.
This kind of argumentation I have not read so far over there. So if we show presence over there: Is anyone of us convinced and able to describe that aspect?
You should also consider that a wholesale buyer only has to pay for the share he was not able to aquire before a buyout/merger.
Sailor
as I do not have the licence to sail in the unknown waters, this is for all of us who are figthing the battle over there against unsubstantial bashing:
With no doubt one of the main recent topics seems to fuel fears of a *potential* restriction of tradeability of our company in any case.
So let´s consider that substantial facts can beat bashers with unsubstantial worries at their own game:
I know some posts over there were replied just by inverting the beginning of the sentences. In my opinion this is nothing more than kidding for better or for worse.
With substantial facts we should have the power to compete any rumor.
So keep in mind that the *possibility* of a restriction of tradeability should not be suitable to scare any investor investing in companies listed at the OTCBB. Furthermore in my opinion we are just talking about a possibility that is / should be part of the expectations of anyone of us.
Our argumentation should be quite the opposite: A restriction in the tradeability should limit the opportunities of investors / potential investors to enlarge their interest / to aquire an initial interest in our company. I call it the fear of getting no more share that shoul be positive for us.
This kind of argumentation I have not read so far over there. So if we show presence over there: Is anyone of us convinced and able to describe that aspect?
You should also consider that a wholesale buyer only has to pay for the share he was not able to aquire before a buyout/merger.
Sailor
(0)
(0)